--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 codebeamer 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: codebeamer 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [애플리케이션 수명 주기 관리 소프트웨어](/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) > [codebeamer](/software/92177/codebeamer) # codebeamer Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/92177/codebeamer Page: 1 / 3\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/92177/codebeamer?page=2) > 최고의 애플리케이션 수명 주기 관리 플랫폼입니다. Codebeamer를 사용하면 복잡한 제품 및 소프트웨어 엔지니어링을 단순화할 수 있습니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.1/5** by 31 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### codebeamer은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 안전을 중시하는 시장의 제품 및 소프트웨어 개발자, 복잡한 기술 제품을 제공하는 데 있어 개발, 테스트 및 규정 준수를 관리할 수 있는 통합된 방법을 모색하는 혁신가를 대상으로 합니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.1/5** | 31 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 3.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: PTC - **Location**: Needham, 미국 - **Founded**: 1985 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$1,500.00 - **Pricing model**: (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Windows(데스크톱), Linux(데스크톱), Windows(온프레미스), Linux(온프레미스), Android(모바일), iPhone(모바일), iPad(모바일) - **Supported Languages**: 영어 - **Available Countries**: 건지, 그리스, 그린란드, 네덜란드, 노르웨이, 뉴질랜드, 덴마크, 독일, 라트비아, 러시아, 루마니아, 룩셈부르크, 리투아니아, 리히텐슈타인, 맨섬, 모나코, 몬테네그로, 몰도바, 몰타, 미국 and 38 more ## 특징 - 버전 제어 - 변경 관리 - 우선순위 부여 - 워크플로 관리 - 태스크 관리 - 프로젝트 관리 - 협업 도구 ## Integrations (19 total) - Bitbucket - Docker - Enterprise Architect - Explorer Eclipse - GitHub - GitLab - IBM Rational Application Developer for WebSphere - Jenkins - Jira - MATLAB - Microsoft 365 - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Teams - Microsoft Word ... and 4 more integrations ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 채팅 ## Category - [애플리케이션 수명 주기 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) ## 관련 범주 - [애플리케이션 수명 주기 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) - [요구 사항 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## 대안 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15367 reviews) 2. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2988 reviews) 3. [Polarion ALM](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/192715/polarion-alm) — 4.4/5 (19 reviews) 4. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4583 reviews) 5. [monday dev](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/1048457/monday-dev) — 4.6/5 (65 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Powerful and Extendible, but needs configuration" — 4.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2018년 12월 3일* | 리서치 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: Codebeamer is very powerful, because it's very flexible. > > **단점**: With great flexibility come a great many settings. Some of those (such as role permissions) are very tedious (and error-prone) to set up. A few buttons with macros, or a text-based interface would have been nice. Also, automation across trackers (say, tasks in user stories) can be tricky/not satisfactory. > > We're using codebeamer to support the requirement management, risk management, and software development processes for medical device development. We also run Scrum in codebemaer. ----- ### "Powerfull tool" — 5.0/5 > **Mohamed** | *2025년 2월 16일* | 자동차 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: very inovative and important to improve the tasks and Performance in Requierement Engineering. > > **단점**: the Complexity of the Platform and some times some bugs needs alot of time to be resolved. ----- ### "CodeBeamer is the worst software tool ever created." — 1.0/5 > **Michael** | *2024년 1월 23일* | 공공시설 | Recommendation rating: 0.0/10 > > **장점**: Absolutely Nothing. > > **단점**: The instructional videos look nothing like the actual tool. The instructional videos and the help feature for CodeBeamer are worthless. Just garbage. I can't follow any of the instructions. > > Flat out terrible. Worst software tool I have ever experienced. JUNK\!\!\!\! ----- ### "We invested significant effort to configure codeBeamer and realized significant benefit in return\!" — 5.0/5 > **Alan** | *2017년 8월 1일* > > **장점**: Very flexible and powerful platform that can be adapted in a variety of ways to align to your process and practices for managing your application lifecycle. Expect to invest time and effort to configure the platform to meet your needs and expect significant return on your investment. Over a 6 month window we rolled out codeBeamer capabilities for: 1) Requirements Management 2) Risk Management 3) Architecture and Design Management 4) Test Management 5) Defect Management 6) Scrum Team Rituals (Sprints, Stories, Tasks, ...) codeBeamer is now our single digital system of record for the full Application Lifecycle. > > **단점**: It can be challenging to debug why a user is unable to execute a task given the intersection of 1) license constraints 2) project permissions 3) tracker permissions 4) field permissions ----- ### "codeBeamer keeps one's promise other ALM's don't even dare to give" — 5.0/5 > **Zoran** | *2018년 12월 6일* | 정보 기술 및 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Simply: it works\! Seriously. I worked with other ALM tools. Either the tools didn't cover (understand) the ALM universe, or the tools were glued together resulting in diminished functionality or even failure. Supected links. Traceability browser. Test coverage. Those tools work perfectly in codeBeamer. > > **단점**: Sometimes it's difficult to handle WYSIWYG. Implementation is done with a third party tool (Froala) and codeBeamer is bound to its limitations and drawbacks. Usually I get my ideas realized within the HTML editor, but sometimes you have to struggle a little. > > Before I joined the codeBeamer world, I worked with other ALM tools. It was really a hard time, lots of things didn't come together or were poor in performance. I remember my first steps in codeBeamer. It was like an epiphany - suddenly everything makes sense and it's really that easy to accomplish. Actually the tool supports you in collaboration and structured workflow. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/92177/codebeamer?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/92177/codebeamer) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data