--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 SpiraTeam 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: SpiraTeam 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [프로젝트 관리 소프트웨어](/directory/30002/project-management/software) > [SpiraTeam](/software/85434/spirateam) # SpiraTeam Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/85434/spirateam Page: 1 / 5\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/85434/spirateam?page=2) > 프로젝트 요구사항, 릴리스, 테스트 사례 및 문제를 관리하는 통합 ALM(애플리케이션 수명 주기 관리) 시스템입니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.2/5** by 98 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### SpiraTeam은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 요구사항에서 테스트, 전달에 이르는 프로그램 전반을 관리하는 ALM(애플리케이션 수명 주기 관리) 시스템을 찾고 있는 프로젝트 관리자, 비즈니스 분석가 및 QA 관리자를 대상으로 합니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.2/5** | 98 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Inflectra - **Location**: Silver Spring, 미국 - **Founded**: 2006 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$57.33 - **Pricing model**: (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱), Windows(온프레미스), Android(모바일), iPhone(모바일), iPad(모바일) - **Supported Languages**: 독일어, 스페인어, 영어, 중국어, 중국어, 체코어, 프랑스어, 핀란드어, 헝가리어 - **Available Countries**: 남아프리카, 네덜란드, 노르웨이, 대만, 대한민국, 덴마크, 독일, 라트비아, 루마니아, 룩셈부르크, 리투아니아, 말레이시아, 멕시코, 미국, 벨기에, 북마케도니아, 브라질, 사우디아라비아, 스웨덴, 스위스 and 23 more ## 특징 - @멘션 - KPI 모니터링 - 간트/타임라인 보기 - 감사 내역 - 경보/통지 - 구성 관리 - 규정 준수 관리 - 대시보드 - 리소스 관리 - 릴리스 계획 - 릴리스 관리 - 마일스톤 추적 - 맞춤형 템플릿 - 모니터링 - 모바일 액세스 - 문서 관리 - 문제 관리 - 문제 추적 - 백로그 관리 - 버전 제어 - 보고 및 통계 - 보고/프로젝트 추적 - 상태 추적 - 수명주기 관리 - 스프린트 계획 - 승인 프로세스 제어 - 시간 및 비용 추적 - 시간 추적 - 액세스 제어/권한 - 요구사항 관리 - 워크플로 관리 - 주석/참고 - 지속적 배포 - 지속적 통합 - 진행률 추적 - 채팅/메시징 - 칸반 보드 - 태스크 관리 - 태스크 진행률 추적 - 테스트 관리 - 티켓 관리 - 파일 공유 - 포트폴리오 관리 - 품질 관리 - 프로젝트 계획 - 프로젝트 계획/일정 관리 - 프로젝트 관리 - 협업 도구 - 활동 대시보드 ## Integrations (20 total) - Apache JMeter - Axosoft - Azure DevOps - Explorer Eclipse - GitHub - GitLab - Google Sheets - Jira - KronoDesk - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Visual Studio - Microsoft Word - OpenText Core Performance Engineering - Rapise ... and 5 more integrations ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 채팅 ## Category - [프로젝트 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30002/project-management/software) ## 관련 범주 - [협업 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [제품 수명 주기 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30009/product-lifecycle-management/software) - [버그 추적 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [애플리케이션 수명 주기 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) - [DevOps 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31120/devops/software) ## 대안 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15367 reviews) 2. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2988 reviews) 3. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4583 reviews) 4. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6035 reviews) 5. [Zoho Sprints](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/169569/zoho-sprints) — 4.5/5 (298 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "SpiraTeam gives visibility to the work getting done\!" — 4.0/5 > **Aaron** | *2018년 10월 16일* | 보험 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: I like that we can see the work move across the Planning (Kanban) Board so it gives great visibility to the entire team of the work that is being done. It is great for agile approach to software development. It provides great integration from Requirement to Development to Testing to Completed. > > **단점**: The toughest part of using this new tool was to determine at what level to put the requirements into the system. As we were transitioning to agile at the same time we determined to put features into the tool as requirements and write user stories for each feature. It worked well. My team experienced some clunkiness, but I believe it was the way we had the tool configured as opposed to the tool itself. We changed the permissions on a couple of roles (BA, Developer) and it worked much better. We also changed some of the default workflows to make it work better. > > My company purchase this and said "here, figure out how to use this for your project". It took be a couple of hours to put all the pieces together. It is rather intuitive and user friendly. I was able to guide the team into how we intend to use the tool to develop our software product. It was easy to get the team engaged in using SpiraTeam. ----- ### "Spira test manager review" — 5.0/5 > **Dusan** | *2023년 11월 21일* | 은행 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: ISTQB theory is implemented in Spira. Easy to use in different categories. A lot of opportunities for project management. > > **단점**: There are no big problems but I have to mention better connection with Jira, full range of services to be implemented in both directions. > > Great help for test management, bug management, reporting. ----- ### "A complete vision of the projects" — 3.0/5 > **Daniel** | *2016년 11월 21일* | 정보 기술 및 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **장점**: The application can modify to adapt the workflow to your needs (based on a complex workflow). The document management is very good. You can change a part of UI (colors, logos, etc.). You can do a personal dashboard with your heat points. This could help you to focus your most important points. > > **단점**: In my personal opinion, the application needs a guidance or a screen that can show the flow process to make more easy the entry of the project elements. > > I was used SpiraTeam in some projects. Our work with the application was right, but our experience with it, is like a fixed application with a strongest modulation of the project process. The UI, is not very friendly with a complex form to work on it. Is true, that you can add any document, requirement, task or other in each moment, but you cannot change the flow of the project. In action it is maddening because you has not clarity of the steps to do with the different parts of the project. But, if you have a big project with many people that need to interact (for example, you need to follow the status of the tasks and the test cases by developer) it is your project application. ----- ### "\#1 Product for Testing, Requirements Traceability and Defect Tracking" — 5.0/5 > **Donna** | *2024년 4월 23일* | 자동차 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: It's very easy to use while also providing 100% Requirement Traceability and can easily be utilized as a product backlog. Teams benefit from being able to track issues not associated with specific tests. Artifacts can be linked to each other with one-click. Resource assignments easily displayed. Customizable drop-down fields and customizable workflows. > > **단점**: The need to have XML experience to customize the default reports. Vendor provided upload file works very well but could use some updating. > > Our team brought SpiraTeam on-prem 7 years ago from a SaaS product. We are able to save files that may contain server or employee sensitive information. Product is used globally from business users to full development teams. No complaints with the exception of offering a broader offering of reports. Fantastic customer service - the \[sensitive content hidden\] himself has joined discussions to ensure we are pleased with the product and is open to any recommendations. ----- ### "Capitec Bank Feedback" — 5.0/5 > **Juan** | *2019년 8월 1일* | 정보 기술 및 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: The Software made Automation easier. Integration easy, total revolutionary product. Very powerful tool if used as designed. > > **단점**: Users. Misunderstanding the designed use compared to their personal opinion. > > Most excellent, brings our Business and testing together in understanding the req. ----- Page: 1 / 5\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/85434/spirateam?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/85434/spirateam) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data