--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 Cradle 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Cradle 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [요구 사항 관리 소프트웨어](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [Cradle](/software/78756/cradle) # Cradle Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/78756/cradle Page: 1 / 2\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/78756/cradle?page=2) > 시스템 및 프로세스 엔지니어링 프로젝트를 위한 완벽한 요구사항 관리 솔루션입니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 27 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### Cradle은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 기능성을 갖춘 시스템을 개발하는 모든 사용자를 대상으로 합니다. 일반적인 시장은 항공우주, 자동차, 국방, 금융, 정부, 제조, 원자력, 프로세스 제어, 통신 및 운송입니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.4/5** | 27 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 3.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: 3SL - **Location**: Barrow-in-Furness, 영국 - **Founded**: 1987 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$449.00 - **Pricing model**: (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Windows(데스크톱), Linux(데스크톱) - **Supported Languages**: 영어 - **Available Countries**: 건지, 그레나다, 그리스, 그린란드, 네덜란드, 노르웨이, 뉴질랜드, 대한민국, 덴마크, 도미니카, 독일, 라트비아, 러시아, 루마니아, 룩셈부르크, 리투아니아, 리히텐슈타인, 맨섬, 멕시코, 모나코 and 59 more ## 특징 - 변경 관리 - 액세스 제어/권한 - 우선순위 부여 ## Integrations (1 total) - Microsoft Word ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 전화 지원 - 24/7(실시간 담당자) - 채팅 ## Category - [요구 사항 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## 대안 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15367 reviews) 2. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3680 reviews) 3. [codebeamer](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/92177/codebeamer) — 4.1/5 (31 reviews) 4. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2988 reviews) 5. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4583 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Customers In Mind" — 5.0/5 > **Sarah** | *2018년 8월 30일* | 항공 및 항공 우주 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: The developers kept the customer in mind when creating the tool. The user interface is very accommodating and easy to use. Capability to collaborate with other tools very helpful and a top requirement when choosing the right tool. The customer service is excellent\! Always available and willing to work with the customer to the needs. > > **단점**: I have not run into any cons. I’m impressed with the tool. > > I’m extremely impressed with the tool. I even enjoy having the capability to work in a sandbox area for practice. Training to excellent\! ----- ### "Requirements Engineering Software - could not manage without it" — 4.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2018년 8월 30일* | 병원 및 의료 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Designed to manage engineering and operational requirements first. Will handle software requirements as well, but I like the fact that it uses terms recognised by civil, mechanical, electrical, marine, aerospace, automotive, nuclear engineers. Second important plus point is its graphical capability. To be able to show how a requirement links to a process or an organisation brings the whole subject of RE to life making it so much simpler to ensure users can record all their requirements and that they can verify that they have been met. > > **단점**: The user interface is very traditional and is ready for a facelift. It works well for requirements engineers but is not as intuitive as would be needed for infrequent access and use by business users. > > From the initial engagement with the staff at 3SL through implementation and support we have been well supported. The few gaps we found for our particular use of have been filled as an enhancement, initially for us, but then will become part of the core product. A very responsive organisation. The flexibility of its metamodel (Schema) has allowed us to extend our use well beyond traditional Requirements Engineering. Where will Cradle take us next? ----- ### "Cradle Life" — 3.0/5 > **Thomas** | *2018년 8월 29일* | 엔터테인먼트 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: Modeling, Requirement Management, Click and Drag objects. Can support almost any SE task. Full SE life-cycle support capabilities. > > **단점**: Performance, Web Access, Older looking, Proprietary Database, Difficult to integrate with other systems. Sometimes that amount of functionality makes it hard to remember how to use the system unless you are in it every day. > > I have been working with Cradle for the past 12 years and have not found a SE tool with Cradles functionality. Other tools do not allow you to follow the complete System Engineering Process from Modeling all the way to retirement. ----- ### "Usage and Administration of CRADLE" — 5.0/5 > **Frank** | *2018년 8월 30일* | 전기/전자 제조 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: It covers almost every task you may encounter during requirements management process. If you get used to the interface it is very flexible and can easily be adopted to specific needs. The text format of the Cradle export files allows a lot of additional (specific) data processing. > > **단점**: Actually I'm missing privileges to restrict link management (especially deleting a link). For people typically working with Microsoft Office application, the usage of CRADLE requires a change in mindset (but this may also be a 'Pros'). The upgrade process is really challenging for our IT. The direct connection of server and client version leads to a 1-day shutdown of CRADLE and parallel distributing of the clients to a lot of computers. The Document Publisher is really hard to use. Template definition requires a lot of effert and experiments until it is running. The publishing process is too time consuming. > > I think its a perfect tool to implement a process for requirements engineering at least to the level we are using it. (We don't do any modelling os far, also no systems engineering.) ----- ### "A very valuable and customizable RM Tool" — 5.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2018년 8월 30일* | 석유 및 에너지 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: CRADLE is a very mature solution, pefectly suitable for large scale requirements engineering projects. It can perfectly be adapted to any business model, process, allowing very specific customization (using an API for interface developments interacting with the tools database). Data access control can be tailored to match a projects organization, data configuration management is very precisely ensured. A wide range of file formats is proposed for interfaces with the external world (for imports, exports, or as attachments) 3SL Team offers a very good support and service when required. > > **단점**: The interface of the client could be considered as a bit stark and old fashioned. (we did not worked with web interfaces) Unfortunately, only one baseline can be open at a time, validated alternatives could only be managed using distinct objects. User experience for Verification \& Validation process (using workflows) could be enhanced (reviews by validator is to be preferably done using XLS exports) Source document import using Doc Loader (Word format) can be a difficult experience for docs with complex structure, and could allow more possibilities (table patterns) ----- Page: 1 / 2\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/78756/cradle?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/78756/cradle) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data