--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 Wrike 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Wrike 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [프로젝트 관리 소프트웨어](/directory/30002/project-management/software) > [Wrike](/software/76113/wrike) # Wrike Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/76113/wrike Page: 1 / 122\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/76113/wrike?page=2) > Wrike의 작업 관리 소프트웨어를 통해 프로젝트를 해결하고 워크플로를 개선할 수 있습니다. 장애물을 없애고, 명확성을 찾고, 목표를 초과하세요. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 3008 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### Wrike은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 팀워크를 수용하고, 여러 프로젝트를 운영하고 고객을 관리해야 하는 중견기업 및 대기업에 적합합니다. 사용자 정의 워크플로, 필드 및 보고서를 통해 요구 사항에 맞게 Wrike를 맞춤화할 수 있습니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.4/5** | 3008 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Wrike - **Location**: San Jose, 미국 - **Founded**: 2007 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$10.00 - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱), Android(모바일), iPhone(모바일), iPad(모바일) - **Supported Languages**: 네덜란드어, 노르웨이어, 덴마크어, 독일어, 러시아어, 스웨덴어, 스페인어, 영어, 우크라이나어, 이탈리아어, 인도네시아어, 일본어, 중국어, 중국어, 포르투갈어, 폴란드어, 프랑스어, 한국어 - **Available Countries**: 가나, 가봉, 가이아나, 감비아, 건지, 과들루프, 과테말라, 괌, 그레나다, 그리스, 그린란드, 기니, 기니비사우, 나미비아, 나우루, 나이지리아, 남아프리카, 네덜란드, 네팔, 노르웨이 and 202 more ## 특징 - Asset Lifecycle Management - Goal Setting/Tracking - ROI Tracking - TT 보고 - Workflow Automation - 가용성 관리 - 경비 추적 - 규정 준수 관리 - 다중 채널 캠페인 - 로그 수집 - 리소스 일정 관리 - 마케팅 자동화 - 마케팅 캘린더 - 목표 관리 - 문서 검토 - 문서 캡처 - 보고/분석 - 보고/프로젝트 추적 - 보안 데이터 스토리지 - 브랜드 가이드라인 - 상호 작용 추적 - 성능 검토 관리 - 셀프 서비스 포털 - 수명주기 관리 - 스프린트 계획 - 양식 작성 및 디자인 - 연락처 데이터베이스 - 용량 계획 - 용량 관리 - 워크플로 구성 - 일정 관리 - 일정 관리 - 재무 보고 - 재무 분석 - 전체 텍스트 검색 - 제품 로드 매핑 - 지출 분석 - 직원 디렉터리 - 채널 관리 - 채팅/메시징 - 캠페인 계획 - 캠페인 관리 - 커뮤니케이션 관리 - 콘텐츠 게시 옵션 - 클라이언트 관리 - 통합 비즈니스 운영 - 프로세스 모델링 및 설계 - 프로젝트 일정 관리 - 프로젝트 추적 - 활동 계획 ... and 208 more features ## Integrations (139 total) - AWS Lambda - Adobe Campaign - Adobe Creative Cloud - Airbrake - Airtable - Amazon Cognito - Amazon Lex - Amazon S3 - Anaplan - Apache Kafka - Asana - Ascent ERP - BambooHR - Basecamp - BigCommerce ... and 124 more integrations ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 24/7(실시간 담당자) - 채팅 ## Category - [프로젝트 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30002/project-management/software) ## 관련 범주 - [프로젝트 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [협업 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [전문 서비스 자동화 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/16/professional-services-automation/software) - [태스크 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [비즈니스 공정 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30010/business-process-management/software) ## 대안 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15393 reviews) 2. [Clockify](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/169607/clockify) — 4.8/5 (9246 reviews) 3. [Asana](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13582 reviews) 4. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6050 reviews) 5. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4586 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Great Tool-- Needs More Enablement Resources\!" — 3.0/5 > **Tyra** | *2026년 5월 27일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **장점**: What I liked most about Wrike was the ability to have visibility across my team and organize and prioritize our project and program work holistically. I felt that having this visibility and transparency helped us with our accountability and productivity. > > **단점**: I did not find that Wrike was very easy to use. I think they fall into the trap that many Project Management Software tools find themselves in-- too much flexibility and granularity. For organizations that are looking for structure and looking to build, this gives way too much up to the interpretation of the user. If this is to work as intended, Wrike needs to provide way more resources to customers in terms of best practices, training, , etc, to enable teams to build what works for their process flow. Without that pillar, it just gives the operations team the world with no where to run with it. ----- ### "Director of Systems On-site Activities review" — 5.0/5 > **Kevin** | *2026년 4월 20일* | 기계 또는 산업 공학 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Easy to use, configure Spaces to meet the needs of my team and organization. I particullarly like the report creation features that helps us with KPI and provides visibility of our current status to the team. I also like the help boards and the ability to add or vote on new features as needed. Team collaboration on projects has improved and as an operating environment we can ensure all project related information and tasks are within the project, keep focus and not having to dig through emails to find what I am looking for or when. > > **단점**: Licensing costs, seem high when compared with some other solutions, making adding licensing a somewhat complex ROI justification. We have struggled with some features we would like like time keep integration with our ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) software integration (Using SAP), so we are not using Wrike to get a good estimate of estimated verses actual from Wrike, but rather using 2 systems to get to utilization a variance to project estimated hours. I have noticed that some implemented changes by Wrike seem to overwrite my custom settings and changes how the Space or particular screen and tree view are shown, though I did not make a change myself. > > As the manager who orginally sought a software to implement for a team of persons \>40 that allows one place to have a single source of truth related to our projects, the experience has been very good and appears to have long lasting positve impact. The system is good for onoboarding new hires and easy to share information on projects current status and projected status. ----- ### "Issues with Wrike - areas for improvement" — 2.0/5 > **Daniel** | *2026년 4월 24일* | 법률 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 1.0/10 > > **장점**: Customization - however it takes a lot of effort and time to customize every aspect creating countless rules. Further, if there's a change in process, or change in person that built it, a great amount of time is required to learn what is involved > > **단점**: Dashboard, interface, calendar. The dashboards were not showing for example what a manager needs to know for their team such as how many projects they currently have or are being worked on. Interface - very slow, cumbersome. Earlier versions were much better that had a launchpad like a homepage to see everything that was happening. Calendar - I amazingly cannot see all the different projects and the due dates pers project. Since we use blueprints to have repeatable projects, we aren't going to rename every task, and can only show the task name, not project, is due on each day. For example an events team cannot see what projects are due or critical milestones for those projects compared to other projects. > > I don't think Wrike understands customers. I think there's a lack of misunderstanding with how teams within a department use Wrike. The high cost of learning wrike, with the intricacies of blueprints, automations, workflows, rules, and then people coming/going from an organization causes a massive amount of learning and rework. Its almost as if you require someone full time to keep developing the product. ----- ### "A customizable project management tool with small drawbacks" — 4.0/5 > **Sven** | *2026년 4월 10일* | 전기/전자 제조 | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **장점**: Wrike is a very flexible software. So if you have good processes in place you can build Wrike for fitting to them very well. Nevertheless sometimes via API not integrated into Wrike. It works well if you customize and it fits very well to special needs. > > **단점**: Sometimes basic features of a simple project management tool are missing. Wrike sometimes does not know if it wants to be a project management tool or a work management tool. Would be good to concentrate more on project management and to implement simple feautures like pausing a task. > > The experience is very good. The support is quick. It is easy to use if you have set up your workflows. For this setting up help is available from Wrike (for payment). The software has a stable status, and if problems occure normaly they are fixed quickly. ----- ### "Powerful Project Hub — A Few Rough Edges, But Worth It" — 5.0/5 > **Dhrumit** | *2026년 6월 3일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: What I liked most: Wrike's task tracking and organizational management capabilities are genuinely impressive. The ability to create custom workflows, set dependencies, and visualize work through Gantt charts and Kanban boards makes managing complex projects feel structured and clear. The real-time collaboration features keep the entire team aligned, and the dashboard gives an excellent bird's-eye view of project health. For large teams handling multiple projects simultaneously, it's a serious productivity booster. > > **단점**: What I liked least: The learning curve is steeper than expected, onboarding new team members takes time and the interface can feel overwhelming initially. Some advanced features are locked behind higher-tier plans, which affects value for money for smaller teams. Occasional sync delays and minor UI bugs (especially on the mobile app) can disrupt the flow. Customer support response times could also be faster. > > Wrike has genuinely transformed how our team manages work. Once past the initial setup, the ease of use improves dramatically. It centralizes everything — deadlines, responsibilities, files, and communication, eliminating the need for scattered spreadsheets or email chains. The productivity gains are real and measurable. Despite some pricing and onboarding concerns, it remains one of the most feature-complete project management tools available. ----- Page: 1 / 122\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/76113/wrike?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/76113/wrike) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data