--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 Arena PLM 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Arena PLM 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [제품 수명 주기 관리 소프트웨어](/directory/30009/product-lifecycle-management/software) > [Arena PLM](/software/6101/arena-plm) # Arena PLM Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/6101/arena-plm Page: 1 / 6\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/6101/arena-plm?page=2) > Arena PLM은 빠르고 효율적인 신규 제품 개발을 위해 분산 팀과 공급망 파트너가 서로 협업하도록 도와줍니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 116 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### Arena PLM은(는) 누가 사용하나요? Arena PLM은 전 세계 1,300개 이상의 하이테크 전자 제품, 가전제품, 의료 기기, 항공우주 및 방위산업 기업이 오늘날의 제품 출시 과제를 해결할 수 있도록 도와줍니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.4/5** | 116 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Arena, a PTC Business - **Location**: Foster City, 미국 - **Founded**: 2000 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱) - **Supported Languages**: 독일어, 스페인어, 영어, 프랑스어 - **Available Countries**: 네덜란드, 노르웨이, 뉴질랜드, 대만, 덴마크, 독일, 멕시코, 미국, 벨기에, 스웨덴, 스위스, 스페인, 싱가포르, 아일랜드, 영국, 오스트레일리아, 오스트리아, 이스라엘, 이탈리아, 캐나다 and 2 more ## 특징 - BOM Creation - CAPA(시정 및 예방 조치) - Data Catalog - Real-Time Data - Third-Party Integrations - 가격 및 비용 계산 - 감사 관리 - 공급망 관리 - 공급자 관리 - 교육 관리 - 규정 준수 관리 - 문서 관리 - 문서 코딩 및 제어 - 변경 관리 - 보고 및 통계 - 보고/분석 - 부품 관리 - 불만사항 관리 - 비용 추적 - 생산 관리 - 설계 관리 - 수명주기 관리 - 요구사항 관리 - 재료 명세서 - 제품 수명 주기 관리 - 타사 통합 - 품질 관리 - 품질 제어 - 프로젝트 관리 - 항목 관리 - 협업 도구 ## Integrations (16 total) - Acumatica Cloud ERP - Altium Develop - Bild - CADTALK - Dynamics 365 - Expandable - Expandable ERP - FlowEQ - Instrumental - Jira - NetSuite - Onshape - OrCAD X - Part Analytics - Sage 100 ... and 1 more integrations ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 24/7(실시간 담당자) - 채팅 ## Category - [제품 수명 주기 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30009/product-lifecycle-management/software) ## 관련 범주 - [제품 수명 주기 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30009/product-lifecycle-management/software) - [제조 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30918/manufacturing/software) - [공급망 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/4/supply-chain-management/software) - [품질 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30099/quality-management/software) - [재료 명세서 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/32498/bill-of-materials/software) ## 대안 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15414 reviews) 2. [CATIA](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/100453/catia) — 4.6/5 (224 reviews) 3. [Plex Smart Manufacturing Platform](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/81953/the-plex-manufacturing-cloud) — 4.3/5 (15 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Arena is growing on me\!" — 4.0/5 > **Marisa** | *2024년 9월 10일* | 전기/전자 제조 | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **장점**: I like that arena has an account manager that for your company that is always available to answer your questions or point you in the right direction. I love how their website has helpful Q\&As and videos so when it is a smaller question, you can solve it on your own. > > **단점**: My least favorite thing about Arena is the training world. It is lacking be able to send retraining to individuals and have other unique features. > > I have only been using Arena for about 6 months now and at first i did not like it all. However, in the short time that I have been a user there has already been a few updates for further improvement. I really love how involved they are with understanding their customer needs and putting customer service first. ----- ### "Arena PLM a perfect solution." — 5.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2024년 9월 12일* | 생명공학 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: It is a great single source of truth for our products that links into our eQMS system without the need to build out complex software in our other systems. > > **단점**: Integration options. When we reviewed the integration options with our operational systems(ERP,CRM) there were not a lot of turnkey options. We would then have to build out and maintain these on our own. > > It has been very positive. Arena PLM makes product management easy. ----- ### "Review from an engineering user" — 4.0/5 > **joe** | *2026년 6월 4일* | 의료 기기 | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **장점**: Arena is a useful document control/management tool with a straightforward training module system. As an engineer who uses the Change Control, Items, and Project modules, Arena has a decent search interface with an evolving user interface. > > **단점**: The usability of Arena is decent, but it's seemingly two steps forward, one step backwards. They're as likely to break a useful feature as to resolve an existing headache, but they're trending towards an ever more useful product. > > Arena is a decent product with an evolving user interface. They do listen, so be sure to send them comments/suggestions. ----- ### "I dread having to use Arena PLM." — 2.0/5 > **Dan** | *2024년 9월 19일* | 의료 기기 | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **장점**: Arena PLM has a lot of functionality, so much we don't really use more than half the features. > > **단점**: The UI is very inconsistent, with every place requiring different interactions, boxes checked to proceded, etc. The UI also does not scale so you need to scroll your browser on nearly every page to find the "save" or other button way off in the corner off the page. > > Every interaction is a frustrating experience, having to remember what to click on this page, where a secrete setting is on another. It is the least intuitive software I've used in my 30 year career, and I've had to use clunkers like SAP. I regularly lose work because I thought I was done with a workflow but there was yet another save that seemed totally redundant. Every ECO I submit is kicked back because some tiny checkbox I didn't notice wasn't selected, some files I entered defaulted to the wrong settings, some input I made wasn't saved because the UI requires to much interaction for each feature. ----- ### "A good PLM with revision control and approvals. Improvements can be made on notification and automations" — 4.0/5 > **Ankitkumar** | *2026년 5월 29일* | 의료 기기 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: The document management and approvals are intuitive. The revision control is easy to understand and work on across the organization. Timely emails about the changes and notifications on the process updates reduce time required to manage multiple processes > > **단점**: The search could be better for individual items and lists. The results should show if the query is part of an item's name irrespective of whether it starts with it or not. Also, I think there should be some bubbles that can help understand individual buttons with org-specific information. e.g. The editions should show how my org uses it. The bubble could say, editions function as versions at XYZ to keep a single file code across revisions. > > Overall, the experience is good and satisfactory. I would like to see features to automate trackers and get notifications on new request creations or part creations irrespective of me being a part of it directly. Right now I only get notification if someone adds me to a request which rarely happens in our workflow since we have multiple people working on similar requests. ----- Page: 1 / 6\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/6101/arena-plm?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/6101/arena-plm) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data