--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 Arena PLM 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Arena PLM 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [제품 수명 주기 관리 소프트웨어](/directory/30009/product-lifecycle-management/software) > [Arena PLM](/software/6101/arena-plm) # Arena PLM Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/6101/arena-plm Page: 1 / 6\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/6101/arena-plm?page=2) > Arena PLM은 빠르고 효율적인 신규 제품 개발을 위해 분산 팀과 공급망 파트너가 서로 협업하도록 도와줍니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 117 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### Arena PLM은(는) 누가 사용하나요? Arena PLM은 전 세계 1,300개 이상의 하이테크 전자 제품, 가전제품, 의료 기기, 항공우주 및 방위산업 기업이 오늘날의 제품 출시 과제를 해결할 수 있도록 도와줍니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.4/5** | 117 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Arena, a PTC Business - **Location**: Foster City, 미국 - **Founded**: 2000 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 2\~10, 11\~50, 51\~200, 201\~500, 501\~1,000, 1,001\~5,000, 5,001\~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱) - **Supported Languages**: 독일어, 스페인어, 영어, 프랑스어 - **Available Countries**: 네덜란드, 노르웨이, 뉴질랜드, 대만, 덴마크, 독일, 멕시코, 미국, 벨기에, 스웨덴, 스위스, 스페인, 싱가포르, 아일랜드, 영국, 오스트레일리아, 오스트리아, 이스라엘, 이탈리아, 캐나다 and 2 more ## 특징 - BOM Creation - CAPA(시정 및 예방 조치) - Data Catalog - Real-Time Data - Third-Party Integrations - 가격 및 비용 계산 - 감사 관리 - 공급망 관리 - 공급자 관리 - 교육 관리 - 규정 준수 관리 - 문서 관리 - 문서 코딩 및 제어 - 변경 관리 - 보고 및 통계 - 보고/분석 - 부품 관리 - 불만사항 관리 - 비용 추적 - 생산 관리 - 설계 관리 - 수명주기 관리 - 요구사항 관리 - 인벤토리 관리 - 재료 명세서 - 제품 수명 주기 관리 - 타사 통합 - 품질 관리 - 품질 제어 - 프로젝트 관리 - 항목 관리 - 협업 도구 ## Integrations (16 total) - Acumatica Cloud ERP - Altium Develop - Bild - CADTALK - Dynamics 365 - Expandable - Expandable ERP - FlowEQ - Instrumental - Jira - NetSuite - Onshape - OrCAD X - Part Analytics - Sage 100 ... and 1 more integrations ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 24/7(실시간 담당자) - 채팅 ## Category - [제품 수명 주기 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30009/product-lifecycle-management/software) ## 관련 범주 - [제품 수명 주기 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30009/product-lifecycle-management/software) - [제조 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30918/manufacturing/software) - [공급망 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/4/supply-chain-management/software) - [품질 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30099/quality-management/software) - [제조 실행 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30033/manufacturing-execution/software) ## 대안 1. [CATIA](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/100453/catia) — 4.6/5 (224 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15497 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "User friendly" — 5.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2023년 8월 21일* | 기계 또는 산업 공학 | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **장점**: Very easy to use and implement in the manufacturing environment. > > **단점**: The interface could have been more intelligent. ----- ### "User-Friendly PLM for Change Management" — 4.0/5 > **Aakarsh** | *2026년 5월 29일* | 의료 기기 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Arena PLM is easy to learn and use. The tab-based layout makes it simple to navigate between BOMs etc. I mainly use it for change orders, ECNs, drawing requests, and BOM management, and it helps keep everything organized and supports good team collaboration. Arena mail notifications are also useful for tracking approvals and changes. From my experience, the platform provides good security and overall offers good value for money. > > **단점**: The system logs me out several times during the day. It is difficult to work with multiple workspaces at the same time. Adding items to change orders and requests could be more efficient. > > I have been using Arena PLM for about two years as a Mechanical engineer, and overall, my experience has been positive. It is a reliable and user-friendly tool for managing product data and engineering changes. While there are some workflow limitations, it does a good job of keeping information organized and accessible. ----- ### "I dread having to use Arena PLM." — 2.0/5 > **Dan** | *2024년 9월 19일* | 의료 기기 | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **장점**: Arena PLM has a lot of functionality, so much we don't really use more than half the features. > > **단점**: The UI is very inconsistent, with every place requiring different interactions, boxes checked to proceded, etc. The UI also does not scale so you need to scroll your browser on nearly every page to find the "save" or other button way off in the corner off the page. > > Every interaction is a frustrating experience, having to remember what to click on this page, where a secrete setting is on another. It is the least intuitive software I've used in my 30 year career, and I've had to use clunkers like SAP. I regularly lose work because I thought I was done with a workflow but there was yet another save that seemed totally redundant. Every ECO I submit is kicked back because some tiny checkbox I didn't notice wasn't selected, some files I entered defaulted to the wrong settings, some input I made wasn't saved because the UI requires to much interaction for each feature. ----- ### "A good PLM with revision control and approvals. Improvements can be made on notification and automations" — 4.0/5 > **Ankitkumar** | *2026년 5월 29일* | 의료 기기 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: The document management and approvals are intuitive. The revision control is easy to understand and work on across the organization. Timely emails about the changes and notifications on the process updates reduce time required to manage multiple processes > > **단점**: The search could be better for individual items and lists. The results should show if the query is part of an item's name irrespective of whether it starts with it or not. Also, I think there should be some bubbles that can help understand individual buttons with org-specific information. e.g. The editions should show how my org uses it. The bubble could say, editions function as versions at XYZ to keep a single file code across revisions. > > Overall, the experience is good and satisfactory. I would like to see features to automate trackers and get notifications on new request creations or part creations irrespective of me being a part of it directly. Right now I only get notification if someone adds me to a request which rarely happens in our workflow since we have multiple people working on similar requests. ----- ### "A capable industry standard product that covers all necessary functionalities" — 4.0/5 > **Tiffany** | *2026년 6월 8일* | 의료 기기 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: After I learned how to use it and navigate, it's easy to do what I need. I don't feel like I'm unable to complete a task because the functionality isn't there. My company also uses Onshape and the integration for that is pretty good. I'm not involved in the Admin-side, but from what I can tell it seems very customizable. > > **단점**: There's a couple things in terms of UI that can be better. For example the search bar sometimes gets stuck in an "Advanced Search" that needs to be cleared/reset in order to get out of, and this is a thing at multiple companies that I've also seen disrupt my coworkers' workflow. > > It's a little clunky but does what I need and is straightforward to learn how to use. There could be some changes that make it more user friendly but it does get the job done. ----- Page: 1 / 6\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/6101/arena-plm?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/6101/arena-plm) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data