--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 Good Grants 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Good Grants 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [보조금 관리 소프트웨어](/directory/30567/grant-management/software) > [Good Grants](/software/206672/good-grants) # Good Grants Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/206672/good-grants Page: 1 / 2\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/206672/good-grants?page=2) > Good Grants는 전 세계 보조금 제공 기관이 보조금 신청서를 알맞게 수락, 관리 및 펀딩할 수 있게 도와주는 보조금 제공 플랫폼입니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 21 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### Good Grants은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 보조금/재단, 정부, 기업 기부자, 교육 보조금/장학금 및 보조금 프로그램을 관리하는 기타 조직을 대상으로 합니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.8/5** | 21 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 5.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Creative Force - **Location**: QVB, 오스트레일리아 - **Founded**: 2013 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: €3,000.00 - **Pricing model**: (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반 - **Supported Languages**: 네덜란드어, 노르웨이어, 덴마크어, 독일어, 러시아어, 리투아니아어, 베트남어, 스웨덴어, 스페인어, 슬로베니아어, 아랍어, 영어, 우크라이나어, 이탈리아어, 일본어, 중국어, 중국어, 체코어, 태국어, 포르투갈어, 폴란드어, 프랑스어, 핀란드어, 한국어, 히브리어, 힌디어 - **Available Countries**: 가나, 가봉, 가이아나, 감비아, 건지, 과들루프, 과테말라, 괌, 그레나다, 그리스, 그린란드, 기니, 기니비사우, 나미비아, 나우루, 나이지리아, 남극 대륙, 남수단, 남아프리카, 네덜란드 and 229 more ## 특징 - Email Reminders - Ratings/Reviews - 결제 추적 - 계약/라이선스 관리 - 권장 사항 - 리뷰어 관리 - 맞춤형 양식 - 문서 검토 - 미리 알림 - 보고 및 통계 - 보고/분석 - 보조금 검색 - 보조금 관리 - 상태 추적 - 신청자 추적 - 신청자 포털 - 싱글 사인온 - 애플리케이션 관리 - 양식 관리 - 영향 측정 - 자원 봉사자 관리 - 재무 보고 - 주석/참고 - 채점 - 협업 도구 - 화이트 라벨 ## Integrations (21 total) - Calendly - Copyleaks - DeepL Pro - Drupal - Google Forms - Google Sheets - Google Translate - HubSpot CRM - Mailchimp - Make - Meta for Business - Microsoft Teams - Sage CRM - Salesforce Sales Cloud - Slack ... and 6 more integrations ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 채팅 ## Category - [보조금 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30567/grant-management/software) ## 관련 범주 - [보조금 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30567/grant-management/software) - [장학금 운영 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30809/scholarship-management/software) - [기업 사회적 책임(CSR) 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/33696/corporate-social-responsibility-%28csr%29/software) ## 대안 1. [Award Force](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/148148/award-force) — 4.8/5 (193 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Looking for a Grants program to fall in love with" — 5.0/5 > **Steph** | *2025년 7월 31일* | 비영리 조직 관리 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Not only can you customise the look of the platform, the pricing is consistently lower than other products - but the basically 24/7 support and response to any query from everyone on the team is AMAZING\! This has by far been the best decision for our Grant Program management since first launching in 2023. > > **단점**: The only improvement I would dearly love to see - is for the Good Grants platform to be able to 'limit' the number of submissions per applicant for each Round we run, currently our package allows limits - but only across the Active Season (which is also on, with a twice-yearly program). ----- ### "Good grants - solution for your grants innovation funds with large volume of submissions" — 5.0/5 > **Rebeca** | *2025년 12월 9일* | 국제 문제 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: the user-friendliness, the video tutorials, and the prompt responses of the help team. Beyond the platform is the team behind. The fact that we can do our grant management assignments directly and the customization of evaluation, besides easy navigation with the videos and checklist. > > **단점**: Dashboard: we would love to do a dashboard with the 3 tags in the application forms, at least for us to split the most relevant applications. > > Excellent customer service, excellent experience, and value for money. \[sensitive content hidden\] are always prompt in responding questions. ----- ### "Content building confusing and not intuitive" — 3.0/5 > **Laura** | *2024년 11월 21일* | 리서치 | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **장점**: Applicants were able to apply without many issues; customer service generally helpful with quick responses > > **단점**: Backend interface for building application forms is confusing with menus that are not intuitive. There are a lot of features that you can turn on and off but unless you're a computer programmer, you're probably not going to use them (and feel a bit lost in them, unless you're relying on the help guides...which are helpful but very wordy and time consuming to read). Features like PDF downloads for reviewers are great but not great when they don't work properly. Redacting information for a double blind becomes a manual process unless your applicant was very good about not embedding info into questions. Overall it is okay but it honestly feels like an overbuilt beta testing version more than a finished product, which further makes it feel overpriced for what you get (a fancy form builder). Maybe the experience is better below the base plan? Might look at other platforms for our next round of grants. ----- ### "Reliable and tristfull" — 5.0/5 > **Enrique** | *2026년 1월 21일* | 의료 기기 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Promness and caring. Good coordination. The deadline involved moved the action impressively fast. Persistence until the issue is resolved. > > **단점**: Nothing that I could notice My requests were tendered promptly and with professionalism, so how could I dislike? ----- ### "FANTASTIC PLATFORM\!" — 5.0/5 > **Vivian** | *2025년 1월 17일* | 비영리 조직 관리 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Quick responses to our queries, always accompanied by a video if the matter is 'tricky'. Platform is straightforward to use and highly user-friendly. All our stakeholders give compliment. > > **단점**: I wish we could have separate 'seasons' within our program. > > Fabulous. Never had more than 24h waiting for a response to any needs. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/206672/good-grants?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/206672/good-grants) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data