--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 TestGorilla 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: TestGorilla 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [고용 전 테스트 소프트웨어](/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) > [TestGorilla](/software/203823/testgorilla) # TestGorilla Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/203823/testgorilla Page: 1 / 12\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/203823/testgorilla?page=2) > 이력서보다는 TestGorilla가 더 정확합니다. 까다로운 채용 결정을 빠르고, 안전하게, 편견 없이 내릴 수 있도록 설계된 판별 테스트를 지원합니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.1/5** by 265 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### TestGorilla은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 채용 과정에 초대할 적합한 후보자를 효과적으로 선별할 수 있는 방법을 원하는 인사 부서 및 채용 관리자를 대상으로 합니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.1/5** | 265 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 3.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 70% | (7/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: TestGorilla - **Location**: Amsterdam, 네덜란드 - **Founded**: 2018 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$1,700.00 - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반 - **Supported Languages**: 네덜란드어, 노르웨이어, 덴마크어, 독일어, 스웨덴어, 스페인어, 영어, 이탈리아어, 일본어, 포르투갈어, 폴란드어, 프랑스어 - **Available Countries**: 가나, 가봉, 가이아나, 감비아, 건지, 과들루프, 과테말라, 괌, 그레나다, 그리스, 그린란드, 기니, 기니비사우, 나미비아, 나우루, 나이지리아, 남아프리카, 네덜란드, 네팔, 노르웨이 and 209 more ## 특징 - HR 관리 - 개별화된 평가 - 고용 전 테스트 - 기술 평가 - 기술 평가 및 채점 - 라이브 동영상 인터뷰 - 맞춤형 브랜딩 - 맞춤형 질문 - 맞춤형 테스트 - 무작위 설정 - 보고 및 통계 - 보고/분석 - 사전 제작 테스트 라이브러리 - 설문조사 및 피드백 - 성능 관리 - 셀프 서비스 포털 - 시간 제한 - 신청자 추적 - 실시간 채팅 - 애플리케이션 관리 - 온라인 테스트 - 원격 지원 - 인재 구인 - 인터뷰 관리 - 자동 감독 - 자동 그레이딩 - 작업 게시 - 질문 라이브러리 - 채점 - 퀴즈 - 태스크 관리 - 테스트/퀴즈 생성 - 테스트/평가 - 템플릿 - 템플릿 관리 - 평가 관리 - 협업 도구 - 활동 대시보드 - 후보 관리 - 후보 비교 - 후보 프로필 ## Integrations (17 total) - BUK - BambooHR - Bullhorn ATS & CRM - Freshteam - Greenhouse - JazzHR - Lever - Make - SAP SuccessFactors HCM - SmartRecruiters - Teamtailor - Tellent Recruitee - Workable - Workday Talent Management - Zapier ... and 2 more integrations ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 24/7(실시간 담당자) - 채팅 ## Category - [고용 전 테스트 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) ## 관련 범주 - [고용 전 테스트 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) - [채용 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30602/recruiting/software) - [평가 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31117/assessment/software) - [동영상 인터뷰 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30821/video-interviewing/software) - [시험 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30843/exam/software) ## 대안 1. [Greenhouse](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/133100/greenhouse) — 4.5/5 (763 reviews) 2. [Lever](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/142452/lever) — 4.6/5 (654 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Great Testing Solution for both new and experienced hires" — 5.0/5 > **Vishal** | *2022년 10월 26일* | 마케팅 및 광고 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: It is a software that helps us make different assessments for different roles, both tech hiring and non tech hiring. The assessments are based on different skills and aptitudes required at that level. Overall our hiring has improved a lot since we have started using this. > > **단점**: I wanted it to be integrated with a ATS , so that we can then automate most of the steps. Its integration with India specific job boards/ ATS is limited at the moment. > > Overall a great product. ----- ### "Great recruitment tool" — 5.0/5 > **Samantha** | *2025년 1월 22일* | 인력 배치 및 채용 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: The ability to accurately identify candidates that leave the testing environment, as well as the live tracking and volume of tests. > > **단점**: The pricing structure. For a startup, a monthly plan would suit best. > > Good so far, I enjoyed the free trial and the demo provided. ----- ### "Disappointing experience" — 1.0/5 > **Pınar** | *2025년 1월 15일* | 정보 기술 및 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 0.0/10 > > **장점**: It is an easy-to-use assessment platform > > **단점**: Poor company policy on annual payments, Insufficient technical tests, inability to fully assess technical competencies. > > We used the platform for technical recruitments. One of the main reasons we chose Test Gorilla was to create tasks for technical roles. However, over time, we’ve realized that the tasks on the platform don’t quite meet our expectations and are unable to fully assess our candidate's technical skills. They are either too simple or too difficult, and some of our candidates also find technical tasks irrelevant for assessing their skills and are unwilling to complete them. Considering all of this, we have decided not to use the platform in our hiring process in 2025 and to return to our own assessment methods. Since we didn’t cancel the subscription, the annual package was renewed. After contacting them within 1-2 hours to say that we didn’t wish to use the product, we requested a refund for the subscription fee. However, our refund request was rejected. Despite repeatedly stating that we will not be using their platform, they are refusing to refund our payment. Customer representatives are not helpful at all and keep dismissing the issue by saying it's company policy. We had a very bad experience with this. It is truly disappointing that we have made a payment for a platform we are dissatisfied with and will not be using. ----- ### "Essential for remote teams" — 5.0/5 > **James** | *2022년 6월 14일* | 미디어 제작 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: I loved that I could add cognitive and non-cognitive testing, and receive a summary of the test results rather than individual question results. This helps eliminate interviewer bias greatly. > > **단점**: I did not like the inability to modify my testing suite after the first interviewer. While I can see how this is interpreted as a feature, I would appreciate the ability to correct mistakes made in the original job posting or test suite composition. > > We felt TestGorilla helped eliminate candidates we didn't need to persuade and helped identify the right candidates with the help of video responses. We were hoping for more non-cognitive skills assessments -- there were a few test suites that helped a bit, but we found that custom questions helped accomplish our goals better. ----- ### "Simple, Intuitive Platform for All Pre-Employment Evaluation Needs" — 4.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2021년 7월 20일* | 레저, 여행 및 관광 | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **장점**: The ability to create a modularized exam to cover different technical and behavioral qualifications through pre-built quizzes. This allows for a better objective review of potential candidates we are considering hiring. I also like the scoring benchmarks for comparing potential candidates. > > **단점**: There are a few technical glitches it seems still in the software with logging into the system, getting passwords reset, etc. > > Hiring accounting staff requires both technical skills that can be difficult to test for (e.g. MS Excel skills, US GAAP, basic journal entries, etc.) in a standard interview format. TestGorilla has helped with providing an objective measurement on these skills to ensure we are getting a candidate who can do what their resume claims they can do without having to have a subjective q\&a during the verbal interview. ----- Page: 1 / 12\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/203823/testgorilla?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/203823/testgorilla) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data