--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 Jira 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Jira 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [프로젝트 관리 소프트웨어](/directory/30002/project-management/software) > [Jira](/software/19319/jira) # Jira Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira Page: 1 / 618\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira?page=2) > 애자일 분야에서 15년 이상의 경험을 갖고 있는 Jira는 성장을 위해 올바르게 기초를 쌓을 수 있는 최고의 팀 도구와 모범 사례를 제공합니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 15414 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### Jira은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 모든 팀 ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.4/5** | 15414 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Atlassian - **Location**: San Francisco, 미국 - **Founded**: 2013 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$7.91 - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱), Linux(데스크톱), Windows(온프레미스), Linux(온프레미스), Android(모바일), iPhone(모바일), iPad(모바일) - **Supported Languages**: 덴마크어, 독일어, 러시아어, 스페인어, 영어, 이탈리아어, 일본어, 중국어, 체코어, 포르투갈어, 폴란드어, 프랑스어 - **Available Countries**: 남아프리카, 네덜란드, 노르웨이, 뉴질랜드, 대한민국, 덴마크, 독일, 룩셈부르크, 멕시코, 미국, 벨기에, 브라질, 스웨덴, 스위스, 스페인, 싱가포르, 아랍에미리트, 아이슬란드, 아일랜드, 앙골라 and 13 more ## 특징 - Goal Setting/Tracking - Real-Time Reporting - Real-Time Updates - Task Editing - 과제 관리 - 그래픽 사용자 인터페이스 - 끌어서 놓기 - 대시보드 - 데이터 시각화 - 로그 수집 - 리소스 일정 관리 - 마케팅 캘린더 - 메시징 - 목표 관리 - 문제 추적 - 버전 제어 - 보고/분석 - 보고/프로젝트 추적 - 비즈니스 프로세스 자동화 - 상태 추적 - 스프린트 계획 - 시각화 - 시간 추적 - 실시간 채팅 - 액세스 제어/권한 - 양식 관리 - 용량 관리 - 우선순위 부여 - 워크플로 관리 - 워크플로 구성 - 이메일 마케팅 - 일정 관리 - 제품 로드 매핑 - 직원 관리 - 직원 데이터베이스 - 직원 일정 관리 - 진행률 추적 - 캠페인 관리 - 캠페인 일정 관리 - 캠페인 추적 - 태그 지정 - 태스크 진행률 추적 - 통합 개발 환경 - 프로세스 모델링 및 설계 - 프로젝트 계획 - 프로젝트 계획/일정 관리 - 프로젝트 관리 - 프로젝트 시간 추적 - 프로젝트 추적 - 협업 도구 ... and 59 more features ## Integrations (53 total) - Azure DevOps Server - Balsamiq - BigPicture - Bitbucket - Checklist for Jira - Clockify - Confluence - ConnectWise PSA - Didit - Dovico - EazyBI Cloud - Figma - GitHub - GitLab - Gliffy ... and 38 more integrations ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 24/7(실시간 담당자) - 채팅 ## Category - [프로젝트 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30002/project-management/software) ## 관련 범주 - [프로젝트 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [태스크 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [애플리케이션 개발 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [버그 추적 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [워크플로우 관리 프로그램](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30091/workflow-management/software) ## 대안 1. [Clockify](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/169607/clockify) — 4.8/5 (9248 reviews) 2. [Asana](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13604 reviews) 3. [monday.com AI Work Platform](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6072 reviews) 4. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (3023 reviews) 5. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4603 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Great Project Tracking Tool for Growing Small Teams" — 5.0/5 > **Jerry** | *2026년 5월 26일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: What I liked most about Jira was how well it helped organize projects, tasks, and team communication in one place. For a small business, having customizable boards and workflows made it easier to keep everyone aligned without needing multiple tools. The reporting and tracking features also gave good visibility into project progress and deadlines. Overall, it helped improve accountability and made collaboration more efficient. > > **단점**: One downside of Jira was that it can feel overwhelming at first, especially for smaller teams without dedicated IT or project management staff. Some features and settings require time to learn, and the setup process can be more complex than expected. The pricing can also add up as the team grows or when additional plugins are needed. For very simple projects, it may sometimes feel like more software than necessary. > > Overall, my experience with Jira has been very positive. It provided strong organization, better task visibility, and improved communication across the team. While there was a learning curve initially, the long-term benefits outweighed the setup effort. For small businesses looking to scale operations and manage projects more professionally, Jira is a reliable and flexible solution. ----- ### "“Powerful Project Management Tool with a Steep Learning Curve”" — 4.0/5 > **Shubam** | *2026년 5월 12일* | 정보 기술 및 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: What I’ve liked most about Jira is how flexible it is without losing structure. It handles everything from simple task tracking to complex agile workflows (Scrum, Kanban) in one place, and you can customize fields, workflows, and boards to match how your team actually works rather than forcing a rigid process. Another standout is visibility. Dashboards, filters, and reporting tools make it easy to see progress, blockers, and team workload at a glance, which is especially useful in collaborative or distributed teams. That said, it’s not perfect—it can feel heavy or over-engineered for smaller projects—but when used well, it becomes a powerful single source of truth for project management and development work. > > **단점**: What I liked least about Jira is that it can become overly complex and difficult to maintain as projects grow. The large number of configuration options, workflows, and permissions can make onboarding slower and sometimes create unnecessary process overhead for simple tasks. Performance can also feel sluggish at times, especially with heavily customized projects or large backlogs. In addition, the UI can be overwhelming for new users, and finding the right settings or filters often takes more clicks than expected. > > Overall, my experience with Jira has been positive. It’s a strong project management and issue-tracking platform that works especially well for agile teams managing complex workflows and collaboration across multiple projects. I found it very effective for sprint planning, backlog management, task tracking, and maintaining transparency across teams. The customization options, integrations with development tools, and reporting capabilities make it highly adaptable to different team needs. At the same time, there’s a learning curve, and the platform can feel overly complex for smaller teams or lightweight projects. Once workflows are properly configured, though, it becomes a reliable system for organizing work and improving team coordination. ----- ### "Once a leader in Agile planning, now at the bottom of the AI foodchain" — 2.0/5 > **Philipp** | *2025년 12월 15일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 2.0/10 > > **장점**: Jira is a straight-forward product for product planning. It originally ticked off all the features I could possibly want for agile methodology development flows. Users can be managed via third party integrations, and boards are easy to design > > **단점**: The company has leaned heavily into AI without first polishing existing features. There is a lot of core functionality missing, and a lot of it feels very low quality, yet the main thing they are producing are AI chatbots to provide poor quality summaries of tickets. > > The company was doing everything right 4 years ago. Since then, it has clearly pivoted in the completely wrong direction and has started to produce a very poor quality product. ----- ### "good for trackin but too slow sometimes" — 4.0/5 > **Debojyoti** | *2026년 3월 26일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: the best thing about jira is the way it handles tickets n backlogs. like if ur doin agile or kanban it just works perfect. we use it wth bitbucket integration so seein PR links directly in the ticket is a huge time saver. plus u can customize the workflow to basically anythin u want. > > **단점**: honestly jira is just way too heavy. sometimes it takes forever to load a single page which is annoying when u just wanna check a task. also the UI can be super confusing for new people. like ther are so many buttons and settings hideing everywhere... its a bit of a steep lerning curve if u ask me. > > its basically the industry standard right now. even tho its a bit slow i dont think ther is any other tool that handles complex projects as good as jira does. we use it every day at work n it keeps everythin organized, just wish it was a little faster and less clunky. ----- ### "Essential Software Project Management Tool" — 4.0/5 > **Ben** | *2026년 6월 20일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: Great management tool for large software projects, integrates well with other tools such as GitHub and Slack. Lately the search feature has been so much better. > > **단점**: Getting email notifications when a sprint changes and all the tickets are updated. There's just not the fine tune options on email notifications. > > We use Jira to manage a long standing software product. It's essential for keeping track of changes over the years, being able to follow back who might have knowledge on a piece of work, when did we add a feature etc. ----- Page: 1 / 618\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fi | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data