--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 Jira 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Jira 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [프로젝트 관리 소프트웨어](/directory/30002/project-management/software) > [Jira](/software/19319/jira) # Jira Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira Page: 1 / 616\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira?page=2) > 애자일 분야에서 15년 이상의 경험을 갖고 있는 Jira는 성장을 위해 올바르게 기초를 쌓을 수 있는 최고의 팀 도구와 모범 사례를 제공합니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 15367 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### Jira은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 모든 팀 ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.4/5** | 15367 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Atlassian - **Location**: San Francisco, 미국 - **Founded**: 2013 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$7.91 - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱), Linux(데스크톱), Windows(온프레미스), Linux(온프레미스), Android(모바일), iPhone(모바일), iPad(모바일) - **Supported Languages**: 덴마크어, 독일어, 러시아어, 스페인어, 영어, 이탈리아어, 일본어, 중국어, 체코어, 포르투갈어, 폴란드어, 프랑스어 - **Available Countries**: 남아프리카, 네덜란드, 노르웨이, 뉴질랜드, 대한민국, 덴마크, 독일, 룩셈부르크, 멕시코, 미국, 벨기에, 브라질, 스웨덴, 스위스, 스페인, 싱가포르, 아랍에미리트, 아이슬란드, 아일랜드, 앙골라 and 13 more ## 특징 - Goal Setting/Tracking - Ideation - Real-Time Reporting - Real-Time Updates - Task Editing - 과제 관리 - 그래픽 사용자 인터페이스 - 끌어서 놓기 - 대시보드 - 데이터 시각화 - 로그 수집 - 리소스 관리 - 리소스 일정 관리 - 마케팅 캘린더 - 메시징 - 목표 관리 - 문제 추적 - 버전 제어 - 보고/분석 - 보고/프로젝트 추적 - 비즈니스 프로세스 자동화 - 스프린트 계획 - 시각화 - 시간 추적 - 실시간 채팅 - 양식 관리 - 용량 관리 - 워크플로 구성 - 이메일 마케팅 - 일정 관리 - 제품 로드 매핑 - 지속적 배달 - 직원 관리 - 직원 데이터베이스 - 직원 일정 관리 - 진행률 추적 - 캠페인 관리 - 캠페인 일정 관리 - 캠페인 추적 - 태그 지정 - 태스크 진행률 추적 - 템플릿 - 통합 개발 환경 - 프로세스 모델링 및 설계 - 프로젝트 계획 - 프로젝트 계획/일정 관리 - 프로젝트 관리 - 프로젝트 시간 추적 - 프로젝트 추적 - 협업 도구 ... and 59 more features ## Integrations (53 total) - Azure DevOps Server - Balsamiq - BigPicture - Bitbucket - Checklist for Jira - Clockify - Confluence - ConnectWise PSA - Didit - Dovico - EazyBI Cloud - Figma - GitHub - GitLab - Gliffy ... and 38 more integrations ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 24/7(실시간 담당자) - 채팅 ## Category - [프로젝트 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30002/project-management/software) ## 관련 범주 - [프로젝트 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [태스크 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [애플리케이션 개발 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [버그 추적 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [워크플로우 관리 프로그램](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30091/workflow-management/software) ## 대안 1. [Clockify](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/169607/clockify) — 4.8/5 (9242 reviews) 2. [Asana](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13571 reviews) 3. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6035 reviews) 4. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2988 reviews) 5. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4583 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Powerful tool for managing development tasks and team collaboration" — 5.0/5 > **Kaynan** | *2026년 4월 17일* | 엔터테인먼트 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: What I like most about Jira is how powerful it is for managing tasks and tracking development work. At NextDay, it helps organize issues, bugs, and feature requests in a structured way so the whole team can clearly see what needs to be done and what is currently in progress. The ability to create tickets, assign them to teammates, and track progress through boards makes collaboration much easier. I also like how flexible it is, since workflows, boards, and fields can be customized to match the team’s development process. > > **단점**: One downside is that Jira can feel a bit complex, especially for new users who are not familiar with project management tools. There are many configuration options and features, which is powerful but can sometimes make the interface feel overwhelming at first. Some tasks that should be simple, like configuring workflows or searching for certain issues, can take a bit of time to learn. > > Overall, my experience with Jira has been very positive. It is a reliable platform for managing development tasks and keeping teams aligned on ongoing work. In our daily workflow, Jira helps us track bugs, manage feature development, and organize tasks across the team. Having everything documented in tickets makes it easier to follow progress and maintain transparency in the development process. Once you get familiar with the interface, it becomes a very effective tool for coordinating work and keeping projects organized. ----- ### "A Powerful Tool for Structured Support and Project Management" — 5.0/5 > **Hadi** | *2026년 4월 23일* | 이러닝 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: Jira provides a highly adaptable and robust platform for handling technical workflows. Its customizable boards, automation features, and integration capabilities make it a great choice for bringing different teams together. From my perspective in product support, I’ve found it straightforward to follow issues from their first report all the way to resolution, always knowing who’s responsible and how things are progressing. The powerful search and filtering tools (JQL) are a huge help when managing lots of tickets. > > **단점**: It can take a while to get used to Jira, especially if you’re new or need to dive into advanced setup and workflows. Some admin tasks feel more complicated than they should be, and the system can slow down if you’re working with big projects or lots of dashboard widgets. While the interface offers a lot, it can seem crowded at times, which can make it tougher for new or less technical team members to get started. > > Overall, Jira has been a reliable and essential tool in my day‑to‑day work as a Technical Product Support Coordinator. It allows me to manage customer issues efficiently, collaborate with developers, and maintain clear audit trails for every task. Once configured properly, it significantly improves team coordination and transparency. Despite the complexity, the benefits outweigh the challenges, and it remains one of the best platforms for structured issue and project management. ----- ### "Powerful Project Management with Strong Collaboration and Value for Money" — 5.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2026년 3월 27일* | 보험 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: What I liked most about Jira is its excellent Value for Money, offering a powerful set of features that scale well for both small teams and large organisations. The platform stands out for its Ease of Use, with an intuitive interface that makes it simple to track progress, assign tasks, and stay organised without a steep learning curve. Its strength in Task Management is particularly impressive, allowing teams to break down complex projects into manageable pieces with clear visibility. Jira also excels in Project Collaboration and Team Collaboration, providing a centralised space where everyone can communicate, share updates, and stay aligned in real time. Additionally, the built-in Diagram Creation tools and integrations make it easy to visualise workflows and processes, which enhances clarity across projects. On top of all this, their Customer Support is responsive and helpful, ensuring that any issues are resolved quickly and efficiently. > > **단점**: What I liked least about Jira is that, despite its powerful capabilities, it can sometimes feel overly complex, especially for new users. The interface, while feature-rich, isn’t always the most intuitive, which can impact Ease of Use and require additional time for onboarding and training. In terms of Task Management, the level of customisation, while useful, can become overwhelming, making simple workflows feel unnecessarily complicated. This can also affect Project Collaboration and Team Collaboration, as teams may struggle to stay aligned if workflows are not set up clearly from the start. Additionally, while Jira generally offers good Value for Money, some advanced features and add-ons can quickly increase costs. > > My overall experience with Jira has been very positive, particularly when it comes to managing complex projects and keeping teams aligned. The platform delivers strong Value for Money, as it combines robust features like Task Management and Team Collaboration into a single, scalable solution. I found the Ease of Use to be good once I became familiar with the interface, although there is a slight learning curve at the beginning. After onboarding, it becomes a highly efficient tool for tracking progress, assigning responsibilities, and maintaining transparency across projects. Jira really stands out in and Team Collaboration as it allows team members to communicate, share updates, and stay on the same page in real time. The Task Management system is one of its strongest aspects, enabling detailed tracking and prioritisation of work. Overall, Jira is a powerful and dependable platform that significantly improves productivity and organisation for teams working on structured projects. ----- ### "Once a leader in Agile planning, now at the bottom of the AI foodchain" — 2.0/5 > **Philipp** | *2025년 12월 15일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 2.0/10 > > **장점**: Jira is a straight-forward product for product planning. It originally ticked off all the features I could possibly want for agile methodology development flows. Users can be managed via third party integrations, and boards are easy to design > > **단점**: The company has leaned heavily into AI without first polishing existing features. There is a lot of core functionality missing, and a lot of it feels very low quality, yet the main thing they are producing are AI chatbots to provide poor quality summaries of tickets. > > The company was doing everything right 4 years ago. Since then, it has clearly pivoted in the completely wrong direction and has started to produce a very poor quality product. ----- ### "Powerful Project Control , Once you master the Complexity" — 5.0/5 > **Garima** | *2026년 2월 3일* | 교육 관리 | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **장점**: Jira is bit pricey , but the value for money you get for tracking projects and teams is worth it. Customer support is helpful , though sometimes responses take a little patience. It can feel complex at first , but once you get the hang of it , task management becomes smooth. Collaborating on the projects and keeping everyone on the same page is seamless with boards and dashboards. Creating the visual workflows or diagrams is a breeze , making team planning and progress super clear. > > **단점**: Jira can feel overwhelming at first with so many menus and options . Setting up workflows or boards takes time, especially if you are not tech savvy. Occasionally , small changes require multiple clicks , which can slow things down. > > Jira is powerful tool and keeps everything organized , though it takes little time to get comfortable honestly , because of its complexity , but once set up , managing tasks , team or projects becomes smooth and visible. ----- Page: 1 / 616\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fi | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data