--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 Perforce ALM 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Perforce ALM 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [애플리케이션 수명 주기 관리 소프트웨어](/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) > [Perforce ALM](/software/19303/testtrack) # Perforce ALM Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19303/testtrack Page: 1 / 2\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19303/testtrack?page=2) > Helix ALM은 요구사항, 테스트 사례, 문제 및 기타 개발 아티팩트 그리고 해당 관계를 중앙 집중화하고 관리하는 데 도움이 됩니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.1/5** by 29 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### Perforce ALM은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 제품 개발 및 QA 팀은 Helix ALM을 사용하여 고품질 제품을 적시에 제공하고 위험을 최소화합니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.1/5** | 29 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 3.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 3.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Perforce - **Location**: Minneapolis, 미국 - **Founded**: 2000 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$89.00 - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱), Windows(온프레미스), Linux(온프레미스) - **Supported Languages**: 영어 - **Available Countries**: 그린란드, 노르웨이, 뉴질랜드, 대한민국, 덴마크, 독일, 미국, 스웨덴, 스위스, 아이슬란드, 아일랜드, 영국, 오스트레일리아, 오스트리아, 이스라엘, 캐나다, 프랑스, 핀란드 ## 특징 - 감사 관리 - 결함 추적 - 규정 준수 추적 - 대시보드 - 변경 관리 - 보고 및 통계 - 액세스 제어/권한 - 요구사항 관리 - 우선순위 부여 - 워크플로 관리 - 추적 가능성 - 태스크 관리 - 프로젝트 관리 - 협업 도구 ## Integrations (2 total) - Jenkins - Jira ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 24/7(실시간 담당자) - 채팅 ## Category - [애플리케이션 수명 주기 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) ## 관련 범주 - [애플리케이션 수명 주기 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) - [테스트 관리 도구 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) - [문제 추적 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30675/issue-tracking/software) - [규정 준수 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30110/compliance/software) - [요구 사항 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## 대안 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15367 reviews) 2. [SpiraTeam](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/85434/spirateam) — 4.2/5 (98 reviews) 3. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4583 reviews) 4. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2988 reviews) 5. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6035 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Difficult to set up, but quite powerful" — 4.0/5 > **Abraham** | *2018년 7월 19일* | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **장점**: Helix ALM is super flexible, and can be configured in just about any way you need. It can be set up to automate some steps, and when you complain, they have excellent customer support. > > **단점**: It is somewhat difficult to set up, and if it set up incorrectly, it is extremely frustrating to use. ----- ### "Good Managment system" — 4.0/5 > **Keith** | *2025년 4월 9일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: I like that this product works better than other alternatives for code management, such as GitHub. > > **단점**: The price is high, and I wish it were lower so that I could use this for more projects. > > Overall, I like Helix ALM, but I imagine that being the lead manager over the server is a huge pain. ----- ### "the product is an example of an old desk top application" — 1.0/5 > **tim** | *2017년 10월 17일* > > **장점**: nothing about this product can be said to be good , it is old , cumbersome and clunky . the product needs to be refactored and replaced > > **단점**: poor reports - difficult to create can not have different type of issues does not really support scrum approach ----- ### "Helix ALM all in one package" — 5.0/5 > **Harold** | *2020년 8월 21일* | 의료 기기 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: There are numerous packages out there but few that are all in one - one support center packages like Perforce Helix. People often forget that the biggest investment is the user's learning time and having s flexible tool with strong support and ownership is essential. Many other tool packages depend on email or user group/forum support that is unpredictable for each of the "linked" parts of the tool set. I've spend many hours to days trying to find help for problems on some of these. That said, I like that Helix in "insanely configurable", flexible and strongly supported with phone center, tutorials, examples and templates. > > **단점**: Round tripping items with MS tools as Word \& Excel somewhat cumbersome. Editing in Helix vs familiar MS Word limited. > > Great, used on numerous projects. I prefer it vs a number of other tools I've used: Doors, Confluence, Jira, Jama, Matrix, Trello, Rational, and in house custom. ----- ### "Powerful tool for product development, learning curve is difficult for new users (using 2015.1.2)" — 4.0/5 > **Shannon** | *2017년 9월 28일* | 생명공학 | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **장점**: Captures requirements, bugs and testing all in one place, instant update so people are all using the most up to date version, easy to add new users and licenses, can update fields and text easily to better suit project needs, > > **단점**: Word export challenges mean that the team won't use the export feature any more and instead has to make the update twice - once in the ALM and once in our "official" word version Test case and Test Run setup isn't WYSIWIG when embedding images into test steps, greatly annoying my developers Test Run system is not adaptable to mechanical testing, where there is one test setup and then many samples to run on a simple test (like a pull test) - so we have testing in multiple places. Validation overhead for medical device software tool requirements means we can't easily update (which means we can't update without spending on re-validation) The tool is not particularly user-friendly - I've used it for years and know where almost everything is, but new users, particularly less tech-savvy ones, have an extremely difficult time moving items through the workflow and executing tests in the system. > > centralized requirement, bug and test tracking with a complete audit trail of edits, as well as "easy" automatically updating trace matrices. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19303/testtrack?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19303/testtrack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data