--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [전자 데이터 캡처 소프트웨어](/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) > [Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite](/software/192454/research-manager) # Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/192454/research-manager Page: 1 / 6\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/192454/research-manager?page=2) > ResearchManager는 전자 임상실험 도구인 'EDC, CTMS, ERMS, ePRO/eCOA, eConsent, RTSM \& 전문 서비스'를 제공하여 기업을 지원합니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.2/5** by 118 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 100,000개 이상의 메드테크, 제약, 바이오테크, CRO, 학술 기관, 의료 및 의료윤리위원회/의학연구윤리심의위원회(IRB) 기관을 대상으로 합니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.2/5** | 118 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Cloud9-Software - **Location**: Deventer, 네덜란드 - **Founded**: 2013 ## Commercial Context - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반 - **Supported Languages**: 네덜란드어, 독일어, 영어 - **Available Countries**: 가나, 가봉, 가이아나, 감비아, 건지, 과들루프, 과테말라, 괌, 그레나다, 그리스, 그린란드, 기니, 기니비사우, 나미비아, 나우루, 나이지리아, 네덜란드, 네팔, 노르웨이, 노퍽섬 and 204 more ## 특징 - 21 CFR Part 11 준수 - EMR/EHR - HIPAA 호환 - Third-Party Integrations - 감사 내역 - 규정 준수 관리 - 데이터 가져오기/내보내기 - 문서 관리 - 문서 분류 - 문서 이미징 - 보고/분석 - 분산 캡처 - 양식 관리 - 워크플로 관리 - 원격 데이터 캡처 - 이미지 캡처 - 인벤토리 관리 - 일정 관리 - 재무 관리 - 전자 데이터 캡처 - 체험판 설계 - 환자 관리 - 환자 모니터링 - 환자 모집 ## Integrations (10 total) - AFAS Software - Clue - ExactSpent - Fitbit - Freestyle Solutions - Polar - Samsung SDS - Wahoo Trace - Whoop - Zwift ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 24/7(실시간 담당자) - 채팅 ## Category - [전자 데이터 캡처 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) ## 관련 범주 - [전자 데이터 캡처 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30551/electronic-data-capture/software) - [임상 시험 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) - [데이터 입력 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30543/data-entry/software) ## 대안 1. [Viedoc](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/160680/viedoc) — 4.4/5 (95 reviews) 2. [OpenClinica](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/78122/openclinica) — 4.6/5 (37 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Excellent software" — 5.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2023년 9월 2일* | 병원 및 의료 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Can exchange data with other research teams, even those working on projects at different trial sites.Provides the ability for electronic signatures, making it simpler to get informed approval from study participants and record it. > > **단점**: Time consuming when transferring large data set from the application ----- ### "Descent EDC" — 4.0/5 > **Noudjoum** | *2026년 6월 24일* | 제약 | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **장점**: I liked the ease of use of it, the validation steps were easy and not too much complainte from the sites about data entry. The reporting is good. > > **단점**: The roles \! They are all prédéfined in the system and cannot be customized, the query management is not convenient, and the customer service is in Rurope which made it difficult for urgent matters. > > I run three studies on it and the three of them run smoothly. Data entry was easy, data validation was easy too. The lock and data extraction were also straight forward. ----- ### "User-friendly system with potential for improvement" — 3.0/5 > **Marta** | *2026년 6월 25일* | 병원 및 의료 | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **장점**: What I liked most about ResearchManager is that, from a monitor’s perspective, the system is quite intuitive and easy to navigate. The layout is clear and logical, which makes it relatively easy to find the necessary information. > > **단점**: From a monitor’s perspective, the weakest point is that SDV can only be performed for closed visits, and only at the page level rather than for individual data points. In other systems, I have seen a more practical solution where each data point has a default status of “SDV not performed”, which can then be changed to “SDV performed” or “SDV not OK”. If “SDV performed” is selected and the site subsequently changes the entered data, the status automatically changes to “Data changed after SDV”. In my opinion, this functionality greatly facilitates monitoring and the tracking of all data changes. Another problematic aspect is the lack of possibility to raise queries in empty visits. In such cases, I have to contact the site separately by email and provide screenshots from the eCRF to indicate the missing data. It would also be very helpful if the query status were clearly visible, i.e. whether a query has already been addressed and closed or whether it still requires action. Currently, it is only visible that a query has been raised for a given parameter, but the actual status is not clear. In addition, in the query list, it would be very useful to see the specific queries linked to specific parameters, rather than only the sections in which the queries were raised. If there are many parameters and several queries, it is easy to overlook one of them. > > Overall, my experience has been positive. I find the system quite intuitive and easy to work with, but I think some improvements, especially in SDV and query management, could make it even better :) ----- ### "Easy of use in multicenter trials" — 5.0/5 > **Mikko** | *2026년 6월 24일* | 병원 및 의료 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: Everything in order and in the same place. Easy to access form anywhere and esay to learn how to use. Makes performing a trial a lot easier. > > **단점**: The automatic query, when missed filling a required field- would be nicer to remind that nort all required fields are filled yet, do you really want to "save as complete"? > > I use it regularly in a multicenter- trial as a head of corelab. Although all the parties involved are located in different countries, this no longer makes any difference. ----- ### "Efficient Clinical Research Management Platform with Strong Workflow Capabilities" — 4.0/5 > **Mateusz** | *2026년 6월 11일* | 리서치 | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **장점**: The platform helps centralize study management activities in one place, improving collaboration between research teams. I particularly appreciated the document management functionality, workflow support, and the ability to track study progress efficiently. The system promotes better organization and transparency across research projects. > > **단점**: The user interface can feel somewhat complex for first-time users, and some advanced functions are not immediately intuitive. Additional customization options for reports and dashboards would be beneficial. The initial setup and onboarding process may require dedicated training. > > Overall, my experience with Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite has been positive. The platform provides a comprehensive environment for managing research activities and helps streamline administrative and operational tasks. While there is a learning curve, the benefits in terms of organization, compliance support, and workflow efficiency outweigh the challenges. It is a valuable solution for research organizations seeking to improve study management processes. ----- Page: 1 / 6\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/192454/research-manager?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/192454/research-manager) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data