--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 OnBoard 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: OnBoard 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [모임 소프트웨어](/directory/30802/meeting/software) > [OnBoard](/software/179015/onboard-board-portal) # OnBoard Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/179015/onboard-board-portal Page: 1 / 44\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/179015/onboard-board-portal?page=2) > OnBoard 이사회 인텔리전스 플랫폼은 복잡한 이사회 프로세스를 간소화하여 이사회 회의를 보다 효율적으로 만들어 줍니다. 지금 무료 평가판을 시작하세요. > > Verdict: Rated **4.7/5** by 1069 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### OnBoard은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 이사회, 이사회 이사, 이사회 관리자, 경영진, C급 임원진(CEO, 사장, CFO, CIO/CTO, COO, CMO), IT 책임자 기업 비서를 대상으로 합니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.7/5** | 1069 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: OnBoard - **Location**: Indianapolis, 미국 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2\~10, 11\~50, 51\~200, 201\~500, 501\~1,000, 1,001\~5,000, 5,001\~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱), Linux(데스크톱), Windows(온프레미스), Linux(온프레미스), Chromebook(데스크톱), Android(모바일), iPhone(모바일), iPad(모바일) - **Supported Languages**: 영어 - **Available Countries**: 뉴질랜드, 미국, 아일랜드, 영국, 오스트레일리아, 캐나다 ## 특징 - API - Risk Analysis - 감사 관리 - 규정 준수 관리 - 기증자 관리 - 끌어서 놓기 - 동영상 회의 - 맞춤형 브랜딩 - 메시징 - 멤버 디렉터리 - 멤버십 관리 - 모바일 액세스 - 문서 스토리지 - 버전 제어 - 보고 및 통계 - 보고/분석 - 보안 데이터 스토리지 - 소프트폰 - 실시간 동기화 - 실시간 채팅 - 실시간 채팅 - 암호화 - 액세스 제어/권한 - 양식 관리 - 여론조사/투표 - 연락처 관리 - 원격 지원 - 위원회 관리 - 의제 관리 - 이메일 관리 - 이벤트 일정 관리 - 일정 관리 - 일정 관리 - 주석/참고 - 중요 날짜 알림 - 지식 기반 관리 - 직원 데이터베이스 - 채팅/메시징 - 커뮤니케이션 관리 - 콘텐츠 관리 - 클라이언트 포털 - 태스크 관리 - 통합 디렉터리 - 협업 도구 - 화면 공유 - 화상 채팅 - 활동/뉴스 피드 - 회의 관리 - 회의 준비 도구 - 회의록 관리 ... and 10 more features ## Integrations (12 total) - Google Authenticator - Google Drive - Microsoft 365 - Microsoft Entra ID - Microsoft Exchange - Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft Project Server Subscription Edition - Microsoft Teams - Okta - OneLogin - Zoom Workplace - iCloud ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 24/7(실시간 담당자) - 채팅 ## Category - [모임 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30802/meeting/software) ## 관련 범주 - [모임 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30802/meeting/software) - [이사회 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30899/board-management/software) - [포털 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/14/portal/software) - [협업 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [비영리 단체 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30805/nonprofit/software) ## 대안 1. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (3042 reviews) 2. [Convene](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/133609/convene) — 4.7/5 (152 reviews) 3. [Bitrix24](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/113540/bitrix24) — 4.2/5 (1005 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Executive Assistant and Board Liaison" — 5.0/5 > **Heather** | *2026년 9월 11일* | 금융 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: OnBoard has transformed how we prepare for and manage board and committee meetings. The platform is intuitive, easy to navigate, and provides a centralized location for agendas, board books, meeting materials, surveys, and minutes. The ability for board members to access materials from any device, annotate documents, and collaborate securely has significantly improved efficiency and engagement. The customer support team is also responsive, and the ongoing webinars and training resources are very helpful. > > **단점**: There are a few administrative functions that could be more streamlined. For example, moving agenda items between meetings requires additional manual effort, and there are limited customization options within certain templates. At times, member management can be confusing, particularly when deactivated users continue to appear in certain areas of the platform. Some repetitive setup preferences, such as board book display settings, would benefit from the ability to save default selections. > > Overall, my experience with OnBoard has been extremely positive. The platform has helped modernize our governance processes and has become an essential tool for board administration. It has saved time, improved organization, enhanced communication with directors and committee members, and reduced the administrative burden associated with meeting preparation. The company continues to invest in improvements and provides excellent educational opportunities to help administrators maximize the platform's capabilities. I would highly recommend OnBoard to organizations looking for a comprehensive board management solution. ----- ### "centralized board management in one place" — 4.0/5 > **Athena** | *2026년 9월 2일* | 고등 교육 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: what i liked most about onboard was how easy it made it to organize board materials, manage meetings, and keep everything in one centralized location. the platform is user-friendly, efficient, and makes communication and collaboration with board members much easier. > > **단점**: what i liked least about onboard was that some features could be a little difficult to navigate at first, and certain processes took more steps than expected. there was also a slight learning curve when getting familiar with all of the platform’s features and settings. > > my overall experience with onboard has been positive. the platform makes it easy to organize board materials, access important documents, and manage meetings in one centralized location. while there is a slight learning curve with some features, overall it has been a useful and efficient tool for supporting board communication and organization. i think once you get the hang of it, its pretty easy. people who has never used onboard might get confused to be honest because there is a certain way to navigate stuff. ----- ### "OnBoard vs. Diligent Boards" — 3.0/5 > **Sara** | *2025년 4월 14일* | 비영리 조직 관리 | Recommendation rating: 4.0/10 > > **장점**: That is a good program to be a repository for information. > > **단점**: I did not enjoy the layout and was not worth moving to this program from our current. ----- ### "AGCS Review of OnBoard" — 4.0/5 > **Belinda** | *2026년 9월 3일* | 비영리 조직 관리 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: What I like most about OnBoard is the ability to keep all board-related documents and information organized in one centralized location. The platform makes it easy to access meeting materials, reference previous documents, and maintain an organized record of board activities. Its user-friendly design has made managing and retrieving board information much more efficient. > > **단점**: As a nonprofit organization, we must be intentional about how we allocate our financial resources and ensure that administrative expenses provide sufficient value to the organization. While OnBoard is an effective and valuable platform, the pricing can place additional pressure on a nonprofit’s operating budget. Higher technology and administrative costs can reduce the resources available to support programs, services, and other mission-focused priorities. More flexible nonprofit pricing, discounted rates, or scalable options would help organizations like ours continue to benefit from the platform while maintaining responsible stewardship of limited resources. > > Overall, my experience with OnBoard has been very positive. The platform is user-friendly, well-organized, and provides a convenient centralized location for board documents, meeting materials, and other important information. It has helped streamline our board administration by making materials easier to organize, access, and reference when needed. While pricing can be a challenge for a nonprofit organization operating within a limited budget, I believe OnBoard provides valuable functionality that supports efficient board management and good governance. ----- ### "Intuitive for both admins & end-users" — 5.0/5 > **Kellie** | *2026년 9월 16일* | 고등 교육 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: OnBoard is intuitive, secure, and easy to use for administrators and board members. It streamlines agenda and board-book preparation, keeps meeting materials organized in one location, supports paperless governance, and makes it easy for members to access materials from any device. > > **단점**: There can be a short learning curve for users transitioning from paper packets or less structured processes, and smaller organizations may need to weigh the subscription cost against their board-management needs. > > We are extremely happy with OnBoard and the value it has brought to our board-management process. The platform is intuitive, reliable, and easy to use for both administrators and board members. For administrators, OnBoard makes it simple to prepare meeting materials, organize agendas, distribute board books, manage updates, and keep everything in one secure, accessible location. It has streamlined many of our processes and reduced the time spent coordinating documents and communications. Our board members have also responded very positively to the experience. They can easily access meeting information, review materials, participate in discussions, and stay organized without needing extensive training or technical support. The interface is clean and user-friendly, which has helped encourage adoption across a range of comfort levels with technology. Overall, OnBoard has made our board operations more efficient, professional, and organized. We would highly recommend it to any organization looking for a dependable and user-friendly board management solution. ----- Page: 1 / 44\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/179015/onboard-board-portal?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/179015/onboard-board-portal) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data