--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 Kickbox Email Verification 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Kickbox Email Verification 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [이메일 마케팅 소프트웨어](/directory/30013/email-marketing/software) > [Kickbox Email Verification](/software/175436/kickbox) # Kickbox Email Verification Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/175436/kickbox Page: 1 / 4\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/175436/kickbox?page=2) > 목록 내에서 또는 캡처 시점에서 실시간으로 이메일 주소가 전달 가능 또는 불가능한 상태인지, 모두 수용 가능한 주소인지, 일회용인지, 역할이 지정되었는지 등을 식별할 수 있습니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 70 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.4/5** | 70 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Kickbox - **Location**: Dallas, 미국 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$5.00 - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반 - **Supported Languages**: 영어 - **Available Countries**: 가나, 가봉, 가이아나, 감비아, 건지, 과들루프, 과테말라, 괌, 그레나다, 그리스, 그린란드, 기니, 기니비사우, 나미비아, 나우루, 나이지리아, 남아프리카, 네덜란드, 네팔, 노르웨이 and 209 more ## 특징 - 구문 검사 - 도메인 검사 - 보고/분석 - 이메일 관리 - 이메일 추적 - 이벤트 트리거 작업 - 일회용 이메일 감지 - 캐치올 서버 감지 - 캠페인 분석 ## Integrations (25 total) - AWeber - Act-On - ActiveCampaign - BenchmarkONE - Campaign Monitor by Marigold - Cordial - Dotdigital - Drip - Emarsys - GetResponse - Google Sheets - HubSpot Marketing Hub - Intercom - Iterable - Klaviyo ... and 10 more integrations ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 채팅 ## Category - [이메일 마케팅 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30013/email-marketing/software) ## 관련 범주 - [이메일 마케팅 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30013/email-marketing/software) - [이메일 확인 도구 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31341/email-verification-tools/software) - [이메일 추적 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31325/email-tracking/software) ## 대안 1. [Emailable](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/176754/emailable) — 4.7/5 (333 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Amazing tool to validate your Accounts/Leads Emails" — 5.0/5 > **Arman** | *2021년 5월 4일* | 정보 기술 및 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: I have been using Kickbox from last 6 months and this is one of the best tools which I have used so far to validate the emails of the leads and previous accounts/business data. Previously I have been using sales navigator which was a kind of manual process however it automated my email verification and made the things easier for me and my team members. I was also able to integrate it with my campaign tools and team was very supportive within this process now. > > **단점**: To be very frank on this part, I personally did not face any issues while using this. However few of my team members found that the pricing part could be relaxed a bit as the platform grows up as it will help startups to go for. > > With the use of Kickbox, now I and my complete team is able to validate all of email addresses before sending final mail to the customers. Somewhere it is saving us to get spammed and blocked on other campaigns platforms. This is a kind of toll which we have been searching and finally we are satisfied with it. ----- ### "Kickbox has been a fantastic tool for us" — 5.0/5 > **Steve** | *2021년 6월 29일* | 정부 행정 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: It was incredibly easy to use, the functions were obvious and loading my file took only a minute. The great part is how fast the tool works, even when I upload a large list it takes only minutes for the list to be verified. Also, the quality of results is better than other tools that i have used. > > **단점**: there were very few cons about the software, I've used 3 or 4 services prior to this and so far this has been the best performing of the tools I used. > > Kickbox took me only minutes to set up and get my first list on through. Compared to other tools it was much easier to set up. Also, other tools for email verification would get me bad bounce rates of up to 10% even after verifying, kickbox is much more accurate as they've had a bad bounce rate of less than .5 percent after verifying. So it's outperformed other tools I've tried. ----- ### "Overpriced, and not the best for disposable or accept-all" — 3.0/5 > **Diana** | *2024년 11월 14일* | 마케팅 및 광고 | Recommendation rating: 4.0/10 > > **장점**: I like how simple the platform is to use. It's a pure email verification service that doesn't try to feature stuff like Zerobounce and AtData. It's great for beginners who want a no-fuss platform with a simple API. > > **단점**: It seems to struggle with accurately detecting disposable and accept all emails. For me, that's a deal breaker as someone screening services for clients. It also took quite a long time to clean lists with bad emails inside when compared to other services like Bouncer who is one of the slower ones. Lastly, it's priced quite higher than most email verification services. > > The platform works for cleaning emails, but I'm not wowed by it. I think the UI needs a refresh if they're going to charge the prices they do. That or maybe more dedicated or proactive service. ----- ### "Professional email verification to boost your list health" — 5.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2021년 9월 3일* | 마케팅 및 광고 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: I like the clean interface for starters. This cloud-based tool is easy to use and all the important info and settings are presented in a clean way. One of the things that I like is that Kickbox gives each lead a score, based on a few criteria. You can also quickly see what your overall list health is. It's good to monitor this regularly. I found Kickbox to be very accurate when I tested a few of my email lists, including a large list with 'old' email addresses. This is one of the leading tools out there. I recommend trying it to see how it compares with the others. > > **단점**: Pricing structure changed a bit, making it more expensive than before. Still reasonable pricing in my opinion, especially since a healthy email list will give you a good return if you're good at email marketing. That being said, new features were introduced over the years, and that's also included in the new pricing. > > This is one of the leading email verification tools on the market. It's been a rising force so to speak and is one of my favorite tools. I like the modern look and how stable this is. You also get accurate results within reasonable time (I prefer accuracy over speed). It's actually quite fast for the number of checks that are performed. I have recommended Kickbox to business partners before and will continue to do so. You'll also find that there's plenty of information on their site to learn about email verification and email marketing. The knowledge you can gather as a user is something you can use in your business, especially if you're responsible for keeping track of the email marketing performance (and risks). ----- ### "Highly recommended" — 5.0/5 > **James** | *2021년 6월 25일* | 정보 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Provides more than just a yes/no response Is pretty quick I prefer the credit approach vs paying individually after each batc > > **단점**: There is nothing fundamentally lacking in this tool. It does the job I need to do it. > > I began looking for a new tool after our previous tool did something I considered dishonest/underhanded. I was introduced to people who worked there and they gave me 1,000 free credits. I used those credits to test 1,000 records through Kickbox (A) vs 1,000 records through our existing vendor (B). I took the results from our existing vendor, suppressed the ones they said were bad and sent the rest. After the send, I looked at: - records (B) had said were OK but actually did bounce - records (B) had said were not OK but (A) said were OK Many of the records (B) said were OK but did bounce were marked as NOT OK by (A), to a statistically significant variance. I did not test records that (B) had said were not OK but (A) said were OK, but I felt like I had been leaving money on the table. With any of these tools, there is always a margin of "unknown" - they can't predict if it's going to be good or not. Kickbox will do a little more with examining addresses \[SENSITIVE CONTENT\] to try to estimate the quality (called a SendEx Score) and will also return columns for "Free" and "Disposable" or "Role" addresses. Kickbox will not charge you for ones it can't predict. The other vendor did charge. Kickbox also charged on a sliding scale - the more credits you bought up front, the cheaper they were, compared to the other vendor always having a set amount. Kickbox's API also returns that same larger dataset, compared to the competitor's "yes/no" response. ----- Page: 1 / 4\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/175436/kickbox?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/175436/kickbox) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data