--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 Veeva Vault 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Veeva Vault 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [엔터프라이즈 콘텐츠 관리 소프트웨어](/directory/31079/enterprise-content-management/software) > [Veeva Vault](/software/173465/veeva-vault) # Veeva Vault Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/173465/veeva-vault Page: 1 / 2\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/173465/veeva-vault?page=2) > Veeva Vault는 생명 과학을 위해 특별히 구축된 진정한 클라우드 기업 콘텐츠 관리 플랫폼 및 제품군입니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 28 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### Veeva Vault은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 당사는 제약, 생명공학, 의료 제품 등 생명 공학 산업 전반의 기업과 계약 판매 조직 및 계약 연구 조직을 위한 솔루션을 제공하고 있습니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.4/5** | 28 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 3.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Veeva Industries - **Location**: Pleasanton, 미국 - **Founded**: 2007 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$1.00 - **Target Audience**: 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Android(모바일), iPhone(모바일), iPad(모바일) - **Supported Languages**: 영어 - **Available Countries**: 미국 ## 특징 - 검색/필터 - 문서 관리 - 버전 제어 - 보관 및 보존 - 워크플로 관리 - 전자 서명 - 협업 도구 ## Support Options - 24/7(실시간 담당자) - 채팅 ## Category - [엔터프라이즈 콘텐츠 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31079/enterprise-content-management/software) ## 관련 범주 - [엔터프라이즈 콘텐츠 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31079/enterprise-content-management/software) - [임상 시험 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/10035/clinical-trial-management/software) - [콘텐츠 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/10007/content-management/software) ## 대안 1. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3680 reviews) 2. [Padlet](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/207199/padlet) — 4.9/5 (293 reviews) 3. [Wix](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/169007/wix) — 4.4/5 (10668 reviews) 4. [Canto](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/32191/canto) — 4.5/5 (682 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Veeva Vault continues to improve" — 5.0/5 > **Prince** | *2022년 2월 5일* | 생명공학 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: Veeva Vault has good features that are standard across the board, but they also integrate well with each other and allow a lot of extra features through customization. > > **단점**: It can be a bit expensive for companies that are just starting off or are small - and there are alternatives out there that are good enough or can suffice for the time being. Also, if someone is not trained well, they can definitely make major issues in the system and support from Veeva may take too long to fix certain large issues. ----- ### "Marketing experiences with Veeva Vault" — 5.0/5 > **Stuart** | *2025년 2월 8일* | 건강, 웰빙 및 피트니스 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: As job creator, it is easy to upload documents, link documents as references, and send virtual job bags to a team for review and sign-off. It date stamps each action, which covers you, if project run late, it objectively demonstrates where bottle necks are in an organisations 'sign-off' team. As a reviewer, the exact text in a substantiating reference to a claims made in documents are shown, saving time looking for exactly the right text in a reference. It is intuitive to use, if have experience using other review and approval systems. It is reliable and doesn't crash like other systems. In 2 years I have never needed to call their Support team. It can handle different media types for review, such as pdf, video, etc very well, better than predecessor systems. > > **단점**: As a job creator, it takes time linking references to a document, unless you like repetitive tasks. If you upload a new amended version after 1st review of a document, it can loose the linked references. Which if its a 10 page document with 30 references is frustrating. There is a copy references, button, which does take the references into a new document, but it can drop links to which text the references are substantiating. As a reviewer, it has no Cons. > > Overall, its probably the best system I have used for document management. Veeva have thought of everything. You can pay less for other systems, but on the surface they seem to do the same, but when you start using them, the finer details and features are lacking with other systems. Stability is also very good. It doesn't freeze when managing large documents. It doesn't crash. This might sound basic, but other systems freeze and crash on a weekly basis, wasting time. I have used 4 of these systems at large international pharmaceutical companies, and this is my preferred system. ----- ### "Clunky Software" — 3.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2022년 4월 1일* | 병원 및 의료 | Recommendation rating: 2.0/10 > > **장점**: Seems to be mostly stable and no unhandled bugs. It is usually quite snappy/responsive. > > **단점**: Poor search functionality; for a content management solution search functionality is vital. If it fails on this, it's dead in the water. Veeva seems to be aware of this deficiency, and had documented their way out of it. They should just fix it. There's other issue/UI bugs that I would expect to be caught during beta testing. Some examples: if text is entered in the search box, and an item is hovered over, the hovered item is returned when pressing enter, the search text is not executed. There are drag areas for files that do not always work. The main search bar does not search everything; by default is searches documents, pasting/searching a change control ID in this state does not return the record. > > Hard to tell how much of my experience is related to my companies configuration or implementation. But generally, the tool never impresses me. There's enough UI bugs that lead me to believe that much of my frustration is Veeva's responsibility. ----- ### "The pharma-grade content management must have." — 4.0/5 > **Tim** | *2025년 7월 10일* | 제약 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: Vault was made for our industry. I like that integrated audit logs as well as GxP compliant. Controlled documents, such as batch records and labels are easier to manage than ever. > > **단점**: It’s not expensive, and admittedly had a steep learning curve for non-regulatory or seasonal professionals. > > We simplified document workflows, were audit-ready, and shortened the approval cycle, something essential for maintaining compliance and progress in our pharmaceutical pipeline. ----- ### "A good choice for life science" — 4.0/5 > **marco** | *2025년 11월 9일* | 제약 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: You can model complex processes (change control, deviations, labeling, regulatory submissions) without custom code, keeping upgrades straightforward. > > **단점**: If content is poorly tagged, search efficacy drops. Automated classification is improving but still requires process discipline. > > Overall experience Veeva Vault is a strong choice for organizations operating under strict Life Sciences regulations that need a unified, validated platform for content and quality processes. Its biggest strengths are compliance readiness and configurable workflows. Conversely, projects that under-resource configuration often face usability issues and disappointing search/results. ----- Page: 1 / 2\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/173465/veeva-vault?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/173465/veeva-vault) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | ko | | ----- ## Structured Data