--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 Jenkins 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Jenkins 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [지속적 통합 소프트웨어](/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) > [Jenkins](/software/171026/jenkins) # Jenkins Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/171026/jenkins Page: 1 / 24\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/171026/jenkins?page=2) > 기업에 프로젝트 구축, 테스트 및 배포 도구를 제공하는 온프레미스 및 웹 기반 지속적 통합 솔루션입니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 574 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### Jenkins은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 모든 규모의 기업에서 네트워크에 프로젝트를 구축, 테스트 및 배포할 수 있는 플러그인을 제공하는 온프레미스 및 웹 기반 지속적 통합 플랫폼입니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.5/5** | 574 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: CloudBees - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2\~10, 11\~50, 51\~200, 201\~500, 501\~1,000, 1,001\~5,000, 5,001\~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱), Linux(데스크톱) - **Supported Languages**: 영어, 중국어 - **Available Countries**: 미국 ## 특징 - Automated Testing - 디버깅 - 버전 제어 - 지속적 배달 - 지속적 배포 - 파이프라인 관리 ## Integrations (9 total) - Bitbucket - Gatekeeper - GitHub - GitLab - Invicti Web + API (formerly Acunetix) - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Slack - SonarQube ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 ## Category - [지속적 통합 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) ## 대안 1. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6206 reviews) 2. [SonarQube](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/210481/sonarqube) — 4.5/5 (68 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15497 reviews) 4. [Buddy](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/157673/buddy) — 4.8/5 (178 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Flexible automation platform with strong testing capabilities" — 4.0/5 > **Nikitha** | *2026년 9월 5일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Jenkins provides useful Features for automating software development and testing workflows. It can support Project Management by helping teams organize and monitor automated builds and deployments. The platform is also useful for Team Collaboration because developers and other technical team members can share build information and track workflow status. Once configured properly, Jenkins can make recurring development and Testing tasks more efficient. Overall, it provides good Value for Money for teams that need a flexible automation platform. > > **단점**: The main drawback is the Ease of Use, especially for new users. Setting up pipelines and configuring plugins can require technical knowledge, and the interface can feel less intuitive than some newer tools. There can also be configuration issues or failed builds that require troubleshooting. I have limited direct experience with Customer Support, so I cannot strongly evaluate that aspect. > > My overall experience with Jenkins has been positive for development automation and Testing workflows. Its Features provide a high level of flexibility, while Project Management and build tracking capabilities help teams monitor ongoing work. Team Collaboration is useful when multiple developers need visibility into builds and deployment status. Although the Ease of Use could be improved for beginners and configuration can sometimes require troubleshooting, Jenkins provides good Value for Money for teams that need customizable automation. ----- ### "Using Jenkins in managing CI/CD process" — 5.0/5 > **Jim** | *2025년 11월 28일* | 원격 통신 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Jenkins is super powerful and ease to use in CI/CD, it can integrate all critical phases in checking out, building, testing and delivery. > > **단점**: The plugin management is still complicated and required lots of rebooting, for example. If I forgot to install git plugin, I will need to reinstall it and reboot the whole Jenkins. > > I already used Jenkins since 2012, it is my first priority in CI/CD, it can be easily used in personal projects in container, as well as big corporate level IT projects. ----- ### "Functional but becomes way too complex" — 3.0/5 > **Edgar** | *2024년 12월 22일* | 정보 기술 및 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 2.0/10 > > **장점**: The software itself is stable, it runs well and is not too complex to install > > **단점**: The fact that pipelines are built either with a UI which makes the pipeline tough to read when you have lots of conditions. The groovy language can also be used to write pipelines, but really ?? Let’s use a more common scripting language for this, maybe Python or ruby. ----- ### "A Solid Engineering Workflow Tool That Helps Product Teams" — 5.0/5 > **Braden** | *2026년 8월 11일* | 디자인 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: I liked that Jenkins gives product and engineering teams a clear connection between design changes, development, testing, and release. Once the workflow is established, it helps reduce the uncertainty around whether a feature is actually ready to move forward. The automation also means designers don’t have to constantly chase updates from engineering. > > **단점**: The interface is probably the weakest part for me. It feels very developer-oriented and can be intimidating if you are coming from a design or product background. Understanding pipelines and configuration also takes some time before it becomes intuitive. > > My experience with Jenkins has been positive, particularly when working closely with engineering teams. It isn't a tool I use to create designs, but it gives me better visibility into how work moves from implementation through testing and release. I found it especially useful on larger projects where several teams needed a consistent process and fewer manual handoffs. ----- ### "The Industry Standard for Flexible, Enterprise-Grade CI/CD Pipelines" — 5.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2026년 1월 23일* | 정부 행정 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: The strongest feature is the Master-Slave architecture, which allows us to distribute heavy build workloads across multiple agents efficiently. I also rely heavily on Jenkins Pipelines (Jenkinsfile) to define our entire build-and-deploy process as code, which supports our agile development cycle perfectly. The sheer number of plugins available means I can integrate it with almost anything in our stack, from Docker and Kubernetes to SonarQube and Artifactory. > > **단점**: The user interface (UI) feels a bit dated compared to newer tools like GitLab CI or CircleCI. Also, managing plugins can sometimes be a headache, specifically 'dependency hell' where updating one plugin breaks another. It requires careful maintenance to keep the controller stable. > > I have used Jenkins extensively to orchestrate end-to-end CI/CD infrastructure for highly secure government and financial environments. It serves as the backbone of our automation, handling everything from code checkout (Git/Bitbucket) to Docker image creation and deployment to Kubernetes clusters. While it requires some maintenance effort, its flexibility and control are unmatched for complex, custom enterprise workflows. ----- Page: 1 / 24\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/171026/jenkins?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/171026/jenkins) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data