--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 CylanceENDPOINT 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: CylanceENDPOINT 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [컴퓨터 보안 소프트웨어](/directory/10005/computer-security/software) > [CylanceENDPOINT](/software/148333/cylanceprotect) # CylanceENDPOINT Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/148333/cylanceprotect Page: 1 / 4\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/148333/cylanceprotect?page=2) > 위협의 99%를 실시간으로 차단하는 엔드포인트 솔루션인 CylancePROTECT는 공격 탐지뿐 아니라 공격을 방지할 수 있게 해줍니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 65 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### CylanceENDPOINT은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 대화형 대시보드, AI, 예측 분석 및 애플리케이션 제어를 통해 맬웨어 및 온라인 위협에 대한 보호 기능을 제공하는 클라우드 및 온프레미스를 모두 지원하는 위협 방지 통합 솔루션입니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.6/5** | 65 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Blackberry - **Founded**: 2007 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$5.99 - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱), Android(모바일), iPhone(모바일), iPad(모바일) - **Supported Languages**: 영어 - **Available Countries**: 미국 ## 특징 - Real-Time Monitoring - 네트워크 보안 - 모니터링 - 바이러스 백신 - 서버 모니터링 - 애플리케이션 보안 - 액세스 제어/권한 - 엔드포인트 보호 - 원격 모니터링 및 관리 - 위협 대응 - 장치 관리 - 취약성 스캔 - 침입 감지 시스템 - 활동 대시보드 - 활동 추적 ## Support Options - 채팅 ## Category - [컴퓨터 보안 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/10005/computer-security/software) ## 관련 범주 - [컴퓨터 보안 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/10005/computer-security/software) - [네트워크 보안 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30003/network-security/software) - [엔드포인트 보호 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30907/endpoint-protection/software) - [사이버 보안 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31037/cybersecurity/software) - [위협 인텔리전스 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/32474/threat-intelligence/software) ## 대안 1. [GoodAccess](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/208155/goodaccess) — 4.9/5 (103 reviews) 2. [SentinelOne](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/152564/endpoint-protection-platform) — 4.8/5 (112 reviews) 3. [OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/166552/webroot-secureanywhere-endpoint-protection) — 4.5/5 (216 reviews) 4. [Darktrace](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/168955/darktrace) — 4.6/5 (21 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Ignore the marketing hype, for endpoint protection this is the real deal" — 5.0/5 > **Brian** | *2019년 5월 7일* | 건설 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: In the three years we've been protecting our endpoints with CylancePROTECT, we have had ZERO incidents across ~250 endpoints. I have tested the Cylance client against true zero day attacks, not recognized on VirusTotal, shared with me by an MSP friend. He has had many clients compromised by ransomware, several more than once, with nuke/pave/restore for the entire organization being the typical response. When I throw attacks against old-build agents, and those attacks are obliterated, it helps me sleep better at night. I don't see these attacks in my environment, hence the testing. The endpoint is the focus of the last line of defense, so PROTECT is critical in my security posture. > > **단점**: In comparison to traditional signature-based (useless) AV, CylancePROTECT and CylanceOPTICS seems expensive. That's why my MSP pal doesn't have his SMB clients on this product, they can't comprehend the value proposition of something so different to what they're familiar with. I guess that's why the marketing initiatives can seem a little over the top, it's hard to get the idea across when some hater says "doesn't detect EICAR\!" > > I have a significant number of users out in the field with limited or no edge protection, so a cloud based endpoint solution is an obvious first step. With a traditional AV client that includes web filtering, which we also have, I would consider those endpoints EXTREMELY vulnerable. Even with excellent email filtering, which we also have, there are just too many things that can go horribly wrong. With three years experience and NO compromised endpoints, I can focus on other security layers instead of faffing around fixing endpoints. ----- ### "Script Blocking and Machine Learning is CylancePROTECT's Strength" — 4.0/5 > **Simha** | *2022년 9월 13일* | 금융 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: Easy to deploy and manage policies across 1000s of assets in the corporate network. Has coverage for various OS platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS. Can perform bulk quarantine across all hosts for a known threat. Whitelist or exclusion is easy to setup. A user friendly console for reporting and oversight dashboard for threat trends and malware families. > > **단점**: Some times results in false positive for the script module and could get tricky to manage exceptions if one is not fully aware of the gaps they can introduce by simply whitelisting system paths where most malware run. Could include real-time sandbox capabilities like other competing products in the market > > Very pleased. ----- ### "CylanceProtect was great. Blackberry Protect? Not so much." — 3.0/5 > **Brendan** | *2020년 11월 11일* | 비영리 조직 관리 | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **장점**: CylanceProtect was by all accounts, the best endpoint protection on the market. It provided outstanding protection for all our Windows and Mac endpoints. > > **단점**: Since Blackberry bought them in 2019, the "merging" of the two companies has been clumsy. The Cylance website dashboard was clean and somewhat easy to use. The Blackberry website looks like it was designed by someone who still uses a Blackberry mobile phone. Mac OS Big Sur is being released this week, and the endpoint client for it (that really should have been released with Catalina) is still not available. False positives for Adobe CS updates seem endless. I'll be looking at alternative options when our licensing expires next summer. ----- ### "CylanceProtect really works." — 5.0/5 > **blair** | *2024년 3월 28일* | 건설 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: -AI based detection. -Respectable/reputable Canadian company. -Set and forget protection. > > **단점**: -Occasional false positive on more obscure software. But it is easy to set global policies to remedy this. > > I have never had a problem with it and from time to time I have used it stacked with other security related software without any conflicts. ----- ### "Cylance Review" — 5.0/5 > **Tonia** | *2023년 6월 22일* | 비영리 조직 관리 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Blackberry Cylance Protect is very light weight and very powerful. > > **단점**: does not offer any enhanced firewall settings > > Blackberry Cylance Protect is very light weight and does not impact the PC's performance. It uses AI and seems to do a great job. It would be nice if they also had a feature for the Firewall settings. ----- Page: 1 / 4\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/148333/cylanceprotect?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/148333/cylanceprotect) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data