--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 SkyCiv Structural 3D 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: SkyCiv Structural 3D 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [엔지니어링 CAD 소프트웨어](/directory/30556/engineering-cad/software) > [SkyCiv Structural 3D](/software/147474/skyciv-structural-3d) # SkyCiv Structural 3D Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/147474/skyciv-structural-3d Page: 1 / 3\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/147474/skyciv-structural-3d?page=2) > 사용자가 복잡한 3D 구조를 모델링, 분석 및 설계할 수 있는 강력한 클라우드 기반 구조 분석 프로그램입니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 34 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### SkyCiv Structural 3D은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 전 세계의 기계, 구조 및 기타 엔지니어를 대상으로 합니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.6/5** | 34 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: SkyCiv Engineering - **Founded**: 2013 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$69.00 - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500 - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱), Linux(데스크톱), Chromebook(데스크톱), Android(모바일), iPhone(모바일), iPad(모바일) - **Supported Languages**: 영어 - **Available Countries**: 가나, 가봉, 가이아나, 감비아, 건지, 과들루프, 과테말라, 괌, 그레나다, 그리스, 그린란드, 기니, 기니비사우, 나미비아, 나우루, 나이지리아, 남아프리카, 네덜란드, 네팔, 노르웨이 and 210 more ## 특징 - 3D 이미징 - CAD 도구 - 데이터 가져오기/내보내기 - 문서 관리 - 설계 관리 - 설계 분석 - 협업 도구 ## Integrations (3 total) - Grasshopper - Microsoft Excel - Revit ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 24/7(실시간 담당자) - 채팅 ## Category - [엔지니어링 CAD 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30556/engineering-cad/software) ## 관련 범주 - [엔지니어링 CAD 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30556/engineering-cad/software) - [제조 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30918/manufacturing/software) ## 대안 1. [SolidWorks Premium](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/93121/solidworks-premium) — 4.6/5 (756 reviews) 2. [Alibre Design](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/172312/alibre-design) — 4.7/5 (183 reviews) 3. [MATLAB](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/125813/matlab) — 4.6/5 (2093 reviews) 4. [CATIA](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/100453/catia) — 4.6/5 (223 reviews) 5. [Designcenter Solid Edge](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/179964/solid-edge) — 4.5/5 (63 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "SkyCiv Structural 3D: unbeatable value for money" — 4.0/5 > **Stefano** | *2023년 2월 13일* | 건축 및 설계 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: What I liked the most was that the prices are affordable. It also has an extensive list of tools which allow a complete structural analysis. > > **단점**: Among the disadvantages that I find and suggest that could be worked on are: the automated generation of designs and the ability to integrate with other design and analysis software. > > Satisfactory, it is an important and affordable tool for both students and professionals. ----- ### "Excellent product" — 5.0/5 > **Bishal** | *2025년 5월 11일* | 토목 공학 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: It makes me able to know the equilibrium condition with fx, fy and fz values. > > **단점**: Components of forces are easy to calculate. Also gives better visualization. > > It is very easy to use and smooth to run. As a new user also, i feel very easy with the help of command. ----- ### "It's nothing special" — 3.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2020년 1월 7일* | 토목 공학 | Recommendation rating: 4.0/10 > > **장점**: It was useful for analyzing a built-up steel section and had good visualization capabilities. Everything is saved in their cloud, which is a nice feature to have. > > **단점**: The types of structural analysis that are offered are limited. There may be more functions in the future, but for now it is useful only for a small number of projects. > > I have used both enercalcs and SkyCiv, which have similar capabilities. I prefer Enercalc because it is much more intuitive and easier to set up the simple calcs you want to do. ----- ### "Best of kind structural engineering app." — 5.0/5 > **Rihards** | *2025년 1월 3일* | 토목 공학 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Easy to use, as I use it occasionally, then intuitive UI and embedded knowledge help enormously. > > **단점**: Not sure if there is anything, I have it to find. > > I found it after trying almost all online and offline apps. SkyCiv was the most intuitive, and affordable solution for my task. ----- ### "Excellent 'Beam' analysis to convey part strength as an ME." — 5.0/5 > **Les** | *2024년 6월 25일* | 의료 기기 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Knowing the cross-section of my part, I quickly sketched this as a 2D section; knowing the supports and loads \& material, I easily entered these and quicly had flexure/deformation/yield results that ballparked my design. I usually do this with a sketch, looking up things I don't know--but in the small part of this package that I used, I intuitively entered data, showed the effect of height changes, and shared out the path toward solution. FAST \& EASY--I didn't need instructions. > > **단점**: I'm a mechanical engineer--most times I am not creating a structure--but often in automation I'm optimizing strength/weight/form/size; and even more often I'm trying to explain WHY to managers or less technical engineers. This software was ideal--but it does not seem available as just a simple beam tool. When I looked at purchase, I need to buy a subscription to a much larger package--when really I just need the most basic bits. > > In 45 minutes I was able to show two different cross-sections under similar loading and support; the sketches were just like the sketches on my napkin. The final images were professional--and deflection results were clear to even the least confident technical person. I'm excited such a great system exists--and disappointed that it is only a larger package I really don't have time to learn--and really have no way to purchase. Big companies aren't great with monthly fees. Kindly note: this feedback represents my personal opinion and does not represent the opinion of Johnson \& Johnson in any way. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/147474/skyciv-structural-3d?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/147474/skyciv-structural-3d) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data