--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 ComplianceQuest 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ComplianceQuest 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [품질 관리 소프트웨어](/directory/30099/quality-management/software) > [ComplianceQuest](/software/136111/compliancequest) # ComplianceQuest Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/136111/compliancequest Page: 1 / 6\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/136111/compliancequest?page=2) > ComplianceQuest는 Salesforce에 구축된 100% 클라우드 기반의 AI 기반 제품, 품질 및 안전 관리 시스템을 제공합니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 112 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### ComplianceQuest은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 생명과학 및 F\&B와 같은 규제 수준이 높은 제조 산업부터 자동차, A\&D, 석유 및 가스, 하이테크 및 CPG와 같은 일반 및 전문 제조 산업에 이르기까지 다양한 고객사를 대상으로 합니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.6/5** | 112 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: ComplianceQuest - **Founded**: 2013 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$30.00 - **Target Audience**: 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱), Android(모바일), iPhone(모바일), iPad(모바일) - **Supported Languages**: 네덜란드어, 노르웨이어, 덴마크어, 독일어, 러시아어, 스웨덴어, 스페인어, 아랍어, 아일랜드어, 영어, 우크라이나어, 이탈리아어, 인도네시아어, 일본어, 중국어, 중국어, 체코어, 태국어, 튀르키예어, 포르투갈어, 폴란드어, 프랑스어, 핀란드어, 한국어, 헝가리어, 히브리어 - **Available Countries**: 남아프리카, 네덜란드, 노르웨이, 뉴질랜드, 대한민국, 덴마크, 독일, 레바논, 말레이시아, 멕시코, 미국, 바레인, 벨기에, 브라질, 사우디아라비아, 스웨덴, 시리아, 싱가포르, 아랍에미리트, 아일랜드 and 17 more ## 특징 - Alerts/Escalation - CAPA(시정 및 예방 조치) - OSHA 레코드 보관 - 감사 관리 - 검사 관리 - 경보/통지 - 공급자 관리 - 교육 관리 - 규정 미준수 추적 - 규정 준수 관리 - 근본 원인 분석 - 문서 관리 - 문서 코딩 및 제어 - 문제 추적 - 버전 제어 - 변경 관리 - 보고 및 통계 - 보고/분석 - 불만사항 관리 - 사고 관리 - 사고 보고 - 설계 관리 - 수명주기 관리 - 요구사항 관리 - 우선순위 부여 - 위험 관리 - 유지보수 관리 - 장비 관리 - 재료 명세서 - 태스크 관리 - 품질 관리 - 품질 제어 - 프로젝트 관리 - 피드백 관리 - 협업 도구 ## Integrations (10 total) - 1CRM - Accounting ASAP - NetSuite - Oracle CRM On Demand - Professional Services Cloud - Rootstock Manufacturing ERP - SAP Customer Experience - Salesforce Platform - Salesforce Sales Cloud - Salesforce Service Cloud ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 24/7(실시간 담당자) - 채팅 ## Category - [품질 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30099/quality-management/software) ## 관련 범주 - [품질 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30099/quality-management/software) - [불만사항 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30674/complaint-management/software) - [EHS 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/10015/ehs-management/software) - [안전 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31299/safety-management/software) - [문서 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31197/document-control/software) ## 대안 1. [SafetyCulture](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/141080/iauditor) — 4.6/5 (353 reviews) 2. [Intellect QMS AI](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/108528/intellect) — 4.6/5 (84 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "CQ : our QMS best friend" — 5.0/5 > **Andrea** | *2023년 9월 13일* | 의료 기기 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: I have been using CQ for +2 years. Since the first time that I started using it, I loved how easily you can understand performing all your transactions. In addition, it allows you to migrate different physical documents or records into the platform without losing any traceability. A highlight for us was electronic signatures 21 CFR compliant.Through this software, we accomplish on of our goals of having a 100% electronic QMS, Can't wait for the latest revision to include as part of this effort, the digital SOPs as a way to release or revise new docs. > > **단점**: Probably the way the permissions sets works. The software in general is very user friendly. Nevertheless, this aspect can be improved regarding the details associated with the permissions sets to understand the impact on your transactions. > > In general, great support and platform to structure your QMS ----- ### "CQ Document Control, CAPA, and Audits" — 4.0/5 > **Elizabeth** | *2024년 12월 17일* | 생명공학 | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **장점**: 21 CFR Part 11 compliance built-in is extremely useful, especially for document approvals and training. Workflows can be customized, and we have integrated our existing objects with CQ. > > **단점**: Audit trails are sometimes difficult to discern, as the user, time, and field are available, but not always the original and changed content. > > Overall, far superior to a paper-based QMS. ----- ### "Compliance Quest - Pros and Cons" — 3.0/5 > **Steve** | *2024년 12월 19일* | 건설 | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **장점**: It is built on Salesforce which is highly customizable. > > **단점**: They have to include your customizations in their package for updates. > > We are working through implementation still. Their product is ideally built for a standard process which we do not fit. It is customizable, but there is some complexity there. ----- ### "ComplianceQuest eQMS+ EH\&S" — 5.0/5 > **Johnny** | *2024년 8월 14일* | 기계 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: The solution is well thought out and feature rich. > > **단점**: We have not experienced any issues with ComplianceQuest. > > Excellent experience with the entire ComplianceQuest Team. Sales, Training, and Technical Resources are outstanding. ----- ### "Great Overall Quality system" — 5.0/5 > **Laura** | *2023년 11월 1일* | 의료 기기 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: The CQ quality system is a full suite of products used for tracking all quality objects. I use Training, Complaints, NCs, CAPAs and Equipment module. With CQ being built on Salesforce, from the beginning we had much better visibility to our data for users and managers alike, creating dozens of dashboards utilizing SF power, from every module, literally at the click of some buttons and drag and drop functionality. This is light years ahead of our last eQMS, and one of the major selling points for us to move to CQ. Our users are able to easily train in CQ and managers can see their employee's metrics for training easily. The equipment module is simple and clean to use and we have taken advantage of the calibration and equipment event schedules to track those tasks. Our NC users have a CAPA request type to easily recommend what needs to become a CAPA, and when escalated a workflow creates that CAPA record for us, bringing over data already entered on the NC. We also did the same with SF Cases, bringing over relevant data to Complaints at the click of a button. This has reduced creation of these types of records so users have more time to investigate the issue, then they have to spend documenting it. CAPA/SCAR records are easy to create, investigate and recommend plans and actions, and follow up with VOE at the appropriate time. > > **단점**: As with all systems, CQ has some things to improve, as far as giving the users direction on the next action to take, making the workflow easier to track and understand from a coordinators view. Version 13 that just came out, will address some of those issues our users and coordinators still find a little frustrating. > > The CQ team has been great to work with. Over all they are responsive and follow up with questions readily. I have seen that tech support and development teams were slow at first, but are coming up to speed now as the company scales. Overall a great quality system that we are happy we chose. ----- Page: 1 / 6\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/136111/compliancequest?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/136111/compliancequest) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data