--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 Slack 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Slack 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [판매 지원 소프트웨어](/directory/30798/sales-enablement/software) > [Slack](/software/135003/slack) # Slack Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/135003/slack Page: 1 / 965\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/135003/slack?page=2) > Slack은 귀사를 위한 디지털 본부입니다. 업무 수행을 위한 명령 센터에 오신 것을 환영합니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.7/5** by 24085 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### Slack은(는) 누가 사용하나요? Slack은 2인 스타트업부터 Fortune 100 기업까지 다양한 고객을 대상으로 합니다. 실제로 Fortune 100 기업 중 77%가 Slack을 사용하고 있습니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.7/5** | 24085 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Slack - **Location**: San Francisco, 미국 - **Founded**: 2014 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$8.75 - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱), Android(모바일), iPhone(모바일), iPad(모바일) - **Supported Languages**: 독일어, 스페인어, 영어, 일본어, 프랑스어 - **Available Countries**: 네덜란드, 노르웨이, 덴마크, 독일, 룩셈부르크, 멕시코, 미국, 벨기에, 브라질, 스웨덴, 스위스, 스페인, 아이슬란드, 아일랜드, 영국, 오스트레일리아, 오스트리아, 이스라엘, 이탈리아, 인도 and 6 more ## 특징 - Discussions/Forums - 검색/필터 - 끌어서 놓기 - 다중 데이터 소스 - 다중 사용자 협업 - 다중 채널 커뮤니케이션 - 대화 내용/대화 기록 - 동영상 회의 - 레코딩 - 메모 관리 - 메시징 - 멤버 디렉터리 - 모더레이션 - 모바일 액세스 - 문서 관리 - 문제 해결 - 비공개 채팅 - 설문조사 및 피드백 - 실시간 동기화 - 실시간 소비자 대면 채팅 - 실시간 채팅 - 실시간 채팅 - 암호화 - 액세스 제어/권한 - 양방향 오디오 및 동영상 - 양방향 오디오 및 동영상 - 오디오 캡처 - 오디오 통화 - 원격 액세스/제어 - 원격 지원 - 일정 관리 - 일정 관리 - 전체 텍스트 검색 - 주석/참고 - 지식 기반 관리 - 직원 디렉터리 - 채팅/메시징 - 챗봇 - 커뮤니케이션 관리 - 콘텐츠 공유 - 태스크 관리 - 통화 라우팅 - 파일 공유 - 프레젠테이션 스트리밍 - 협업 도구 - 화면 녹화 - 화면 캡처 - 화상 채팅 - 활동/뉴스 피드 - 회의 관리 ... and 14 more features ## Integrations (186 total) - 5pm - Aha\! - Airbrake - Aircall - Airtable - Amplitude - Any.do - AppSignal - Asana - Assembla - Automile - Azuqua - AzureDesk - Baremetrics - Beanstalk ... and 171 more integrations ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 채팅 ## Category - [판매 지원 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30798/sales-enablement/software) ## 관련 범주 - [판매 지원 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30798/sales-enablement/software) - [영업 참여 플랫폼 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/32195/sales-engagement-platform/software) - [화면 녹화 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31975/screen-recording/software) - [콘텐츠 협업 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/32935/content-collaboration/software) - [직원 커뮤니케이션 도구 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31543/employee-communication-tools/software) ## 대안 1. [Microsoft Teams](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/168668/microsoft-teams) — 4.5/5 (11001 reviews) 2. [Bitrix24](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/113540/bitrix24) — 4.2/5 (989 reviews) 3. [Asana](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13561 reviews) 4. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6008 reviews) 5. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2970 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "This is an essential service when proceeding with the project." — 5.0/5 > **MYOUNG UN** | *2024년 7월 23일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Create projects, create channels, and easily invite members. You can have real-time conversations with the invited members, such as 1:1 conversations and group conversations, and discussions and discussions on various topics within the channel. Also, within the same project, a separate channel for each task can be created and proceeded, so the project can be operated in various forms. And Slack is very light, providing a pleasant service environment. > > **단점**: I am using only the necessary functions of the slack, so there is no disadvantage yet. > > When working on a project, it is very important how to collaborate with the participating members. Slack is very good as a service that we create together, such as quick conversation and data sharing. ----- ### "The Quiet Backbone of How Our Team Actually Works" — 5.0/5 > **saidi** | *2026년 4월 6일* | 애니메이션 | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **장점**: What I like most about Slack is honestly just how natural it makes communication feel. It doesn't feel like a work tool it feels like texting your team. You ask something, you get an answer, you move on. No drafting a formal email, no waiting a day for a reply, just a quick back and forth that actually keeps things moving. The channels are a big part of that too. Everything has its place — there's a channel for the project, a channel for random stuff, a channel for announcements and nothing gets mixed up. You're not digging through one giant inbox trying to figure out what belongs where. And the integrations are just everywhere. Your notifications from GitHub, your alerts from whatever tool you're using, your standup bot it all just flows into Slack and suddenly you have one place where you actually know what's going on. It just makes the whole team feel closer, even when everyone's working from different places. > > **단점**: What I liked least is honestly the notifications. Once your team grows and you're in a bunch of channels, it becomes a lot. You're constantly getting pinged and if you're not careful it just kills your focus. You end up either checking Slack every five minutes or missing something important because you muted too much. The search is also not as smooth as it should be. Finding an old message or a file someone shared three weeks ago feels harder than it needs to be. You kind of have to remember exactly what was said to track it down, which defeats the purpose. And the free plan has that message history limit which is genuinely frustrating. You go back to find something from a few months ago and it's just gone. For small teams or startups watching their budget, that feels like a pretty big thing to lock behind a paywall. None of it is enough to walk away from it, but you do feel the friction after a while. > > lack has been one of those tools that just quietly becomes essential. You don't really make a big decision to rely on it it just kind of happens because it works. The overall experience has been really positive. It sped up how we communicate, made it easier to stay on top of what's happening across the team, and honestly just made work feel a bit less formal and more human. Instead of everything being this rigid back and forth over email, conversations happen naturally and things get resolved faster. There are rough edges here and there the notifications can get out of hand and the pricing stings a little as you scale but when you zoom out, the impact it has on how a team functions together is hard to argue with. It's one of those tools where once you've used it properly, going back to anything else feels like a step backwards. For remote or hybrid teams especially, it's pretty close to irreplaceable. ----- ### "Slack is Good" — 4.0/5 > **Bronx** | *2026년 3월 19일* | 정보 기술 및 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: As a free app, it's an extremely good deal especially for small workplace teams. If you are operating with a small group to get something done, it’s very easy to use > > **단점**: There are some features that Don’t function correctly for me like the huddle feature. I would prefer other apps for voice calls as well. > > I use slack daily for work and it’s pretty easy to navigate although some of the hotkey functions aren’t easily reversible. That might be a me problem though. ----- ### "I like slack" — 3.0/5 > **Samer** | *2026년 3월 10일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **장점**: It is a nice platform to communicate and organise a community or multiple communities in groups and workspaces. > > **단점**: The user interface is a little bit complex, and I find other platforms simpler and more useful to use. > > It is nice, but I do not use it so often, and I am happy to have it in my software stack and connect to colleagues on it. ----- ### "I like it so much I call all my chat apps Slack" — 5.0/5 > **Sarah** | *2026년 1월 30일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Slack has a sense of irreverence to it that is helpful for remote and hybrid cultures. A "cool kid" factor that you just don't find with Teams or other options. The app is also excellent and easy to use. > > **단점**: I don't prefer using Threads. I think the use of inline replies as an option instead of breaking out a thread is helpful in larger groups or longer conversations involving multitasking. I would also say that Teams calls are more intuitive and helpful than Huddles. Even still I prefer the experience overall to that of Teams and especially Google Chat. > > Slack is easy and fun to use. There are just enough customizations and the integrations make the experience unique to your organization but familiar enough as you bring on new team members. I've used it at enterprise, smb and startup environments and it delivered in equal measure for each. Solid value for the money and very limited bugs and issues. I haven't used the customer support and don't have much to say about File storage features. ----- Page: 1 / 965\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/135003/slack?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/135003/slack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fi | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data