--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 GitHub 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitHub 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [애플리케이션 개발 소프트웨어](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [GitHub](/software/129067/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/129067/github Page: 1 / 248\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/129067/github?page=2) > GitHub를 통해 개발 팀은 DevOps 파이프라인 및 내장된 코드 보안 내에서 코드 협업, 검토 및 관리를 수행할 수 있습니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 6170 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### GitHub은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 스타트 및 소규모 기업업부터 Fortune 50 기업까지 많은 개발 팀들이 모든 단계에서 GitHub를 사용하고 있습니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.8/5** | 6170 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Microsoft - **Location**: Redmond, 미국 - **Founded**: 1975 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$4.00 - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱), Windows(온프레미스), Linux(온프레미스), Android(모바일), iPhone(모바일), iPad(모바일) - **Supported Languages**: 영어 - **Available Countries**: 남아프리카, 네덜란드, 노르웨이, 뉴질랜드, 대한민국, 덴마크, 독일, 라트비아, 러시아, 루마니아, 룩셈부르크, 리비아, 리투아니아, 리히텐슈타인, 말레이시아, 멕시코, 미국, 벨기에, 벨라루스, 불가리아 and 27 more ## 특징 - Automated Testing - Real-Time Analytics - 구성 관리 - 그래픽 사용자 인터페이스 - 대시보드 - 디버깅 - 릴리스 관리 - 마일스톤 추적 - 모니터링 - 문제 관리 - 문제 추적 - 백로그 관리 - 버그 추적 - 버그/문제 캡처 - 버전 제어 - 보고/프로젝트 추적 - 애플리케이션 보안 - 저장소 관리 - 지속적 배달 - 지속적 배포 - 지속적 통합 - 취약성 스캔 - 코드 검토 - 태스크 관리 - 태스크 진행률 추적 - 통합 개발 환경 - 티켓 관리 - 파일 공유 - 품질 보증 - 프로젝트 관리 - 협업 개발 - 협업 도구 ## Integrations (14 total) - CircleCI - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Vercel - Visual Studio Code ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 ## Category - [애플리케이션 개발 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## 관련 범주 - [애플리케이션 개발 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [소스 코드 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) - [비영리 프로젝트 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) - [프로젝트 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [지속적 통합 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) ## 대안 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15367 reviews) 2. [SpiraTeam](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/85434/spirateam) — 4.2/5 (98 reviews) 3. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2988 reviews) 4. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4583 reviews) 5. [Bitrix24](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/113540/bitrix24) — 4.2/5 (990 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "The undisputed standard for code collaboration and open source" — 4.0/5 > **Davide** | *2026년 4월 17일* | 보안 및 조사 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: GitHub Actions is the CI/CD tool I prefer over any other. It is immediate, works extremely well, supports multiple operating systems, and even allows you to run self-hosted runners on-premises with minimal setup. What makes it truly powerful is the ecosystem: thousands of community-built, reusable actions exist for almost every use case, so you rarely have to reinvent the wheel. This saves an enormous amount of time day to day. Beyond Actions, the pull request workflow is excellent and the collaboration features — Issues and Discussions in particular — are extremely convenient and well-designed. GitHub is also the de facto standard for open source: almost every meaningful open source project lives here, and the fact that public repositories are free makes it the natural home for community-driven software. I use it both for my personal open source projects and at an enterprise level, and it handles both scenarios very well. The ability to host public and private repositories on the same platform without needing separate tools is a significant advantage. > > **단점**: The project management section (GitHub Projects) still feels rough compared to dedicated tools like Linear. It works, but the UX is unintuitive and I usually reach for other tools when I need real project tracking. Issues and Discussions are great; Projects needs more work. Stability has also become a concern. GitHub has been experiencing more frequent outages lately. They are usually short, but they are disruptive — when your entire workflow depends on GitHub (pushing code, running pipelines, reviewing PRs), even brief downtime brings everything to a halt. Finally, the notification system is genuinely broken for my use case. The sheer volume of notifications makes it nearly impossible to find the ones that actually matter — a comment on your own issue, a review request, a mention. I often miss important updates unless someone tells me directly or I stumble across them manually. > > GitHub is a tool I would recommend to any team, regardless of size or industry. Small teams can get started for free; larger organizations can scale up to GitHub Enterprise. The platform works equally well for closed-source commercial projects and public open source repositories, and you never need to split your work across multiple tools. I would especially recommend it to anyone building or contributing to open source software — GitHub is the central hub where projects are born, grow, and gain traction. There is simply no better place to build in public. It is also worth noting that GitHub is not limited to software developers. Writers, researchers, and academics can benefit from version-controlled plain-text workflows (Markdown, LaTeX) managed through branches and releases — and modern AI tooling makes the learning curve much more approachable than it used to be. In short: I could not work without GitHub. Despite its rough edges, it remains the most complete and widely adopted platform for code collaboration and version control available today. ----- ### "Reliable but stingy github actions capacity" — 5.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2026년 3월 26일* | 의료 실무 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: I appreciate the github actions, which allows me to run automated testing for each one of my pull requests. > > **단점**: It's annoying that I am not able to have unlimited github actions for private repos that I pay for. It's limited to a cap, which I think is a little stingy considering that I am a paying customer. I would have expected the same caps as public github repos. > > Overall, the experience is great. It's a very convenience way to store my git repos online, and I can trust that the data will be there to stay since it is owned by Microsoft. I've have my github for almost 10 years. Some years I am more active than others, but I can always count on the experience being consistent and reliable. ----- ### "Good tool for code management but lacks some features when integrating with Confluence/Jira" — 3.0/5 > **Mark** | *2025년 6월 3일* | 정보 기술 및 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **장점**: GitHub is a great tool to manage pull requests and being able to add labels in our teams helps to differentiate between urgent items which need reviews and are vital for the next release. > > **단점**: One of the drawbacks with GitHub is integrating non development team members into a workflow process. Even though it is possible to setup a workflow too add approvers the terminology and UI is very developer based so can be a bit confusing to non development colleagues. > > Overall GItHub is a good tool for managing code, getting reviews and merging into the relevant branch ahead of deployment. There are some good integrations but it would be great if it could work more seamlessly with Confluence and Jira, and provide additional features to help automatically manage the correct states of the linked jira. ----- ### "Perfect for all sizes of projects" — 5.0/5 > **🧑‍💻 Owain** | *2026년 4월 6일* | 인터넷 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: I enjoy working with GitHub due to its ease of use and that so many people use it so there are tons of online resources available if you get stuck trying to set something up > > **단점**: Sometimes swapping between repos can be cumbersome. If you have multiple organisations it's not always a smooth transition between repos > > I enjoy working with GitHub so much that we've recently migrated all our bitbucket repos to GitHub. It's great that we can keep client repos private but still show our activity on our own personal accounts ----- ### "Powerful Platform for Prototyping and Collaboration" — 4.0/5 > **Jerrid** | *2026년 4월 10일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: GitHub helps me keep my client projects organized and easy to manage. I use it to store and share prototypes, track versions, and show clients how things change over time. Being able to see changes and quickly go back if something doesn’t work is really helpful. It makes both my clients and me feel more confident as we try out new ideas and make improvements. > > **단점**: The main downside of GitHub for me has been the support experience. It’s difficult to get direct help beyond the community, since you’re mostly limited to creating support tickets. Response times can be slow, and it often feels hard to get timely, personalized assistance when issues come up. > > Overall, GitHub has been a very effective platform. It gives me a reliable place to store projects, build and share prototypes, and manage version control so I can clearly show different iterations to clients and easily roll back if needed. While the support experience can be frustrating at times, especially the reliance on tickets and slower response times, the core features, stability, and collaboration tools have made it a valuable part of my workflow. ----- Page: 1 / 248\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/129067/github?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/129067/github) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data