--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 TestRail 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: TestRail 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [테스트 관리 도구 소프트웨어](/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) > [TestRail](/software/128204/testrail) # TestRail Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/128204/testrail Page: 1 / 8\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/128204/testrail?page=2) > 실시간 대시보드 및 활동 보고서를 지원하는 TestRail 테스트 사례 관리 기능으로 소프트웨어 테스트 프로세스를 최적화할 수 있습니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.3/5** by 178 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### TestRail은(는) 누가 사용하나요? QA 및 개발 팀을 위한 최신 테스트 사례 관리 소프트웨어 ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.3/5** | 178 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: IDERA - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$38.00 - **Pricing model**: (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱), Linux(데스크톱), Windows(온프레미스), Linux(온프레미스), Chromebook(데스크톱) - **Supported Languages**: 영어 - **Available Countries**: 가나, 가봉, 가이아나, 감비아, 건지, 과들루프, 과테말라, 괌, 그레나다, 그리스, 그린란드, 기니, 기니비사우, 나미비아, 나우루, 나이지리아, 남아프리카, 네덜란드, 네팔, 노르웨이 and 209 more ## 특징 - Automated Testing - Multiple Test Types - 결함 추적 - 계층 보기 - 로드 테스트 - 보고/분석 - 소프트웨어 테스트 관리 - 액세스 제어/권한 - 요구사항 관리 - 저장소 관리 - 지속적 통합 - 추적 가능성 - 테스트 관리 - 품질 보증 - 협업 도구 ## Integrations (29 total) - Asana - Assembla - Axosoft - Azure DevOps Server - Bitbucket - Bugzilla - CircleCI - ClickUp - Confluence - Cypress - DesignWise - FogBugz - Functionize - GitHub - GitLab ... and 14 more integrations ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 채팅 ## Category - [테스트 관리 도구 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## 관련 범주 - [테스트 관리 도구 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) - [애플리케이션 개발 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [사용자 테스트 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [성능 테스트 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31124/performance-testing/software) - [자동 테스트 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## 대안 1. [Tricentis qTest](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/173762/qtest) — 4.4/5 (27 reviews) 2. [SpiraTest](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/70008/spiratest) — 4.0/5 (104 reviews) 3. [Tricentis Tosca](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/120858/tricentis-tosca) — 4.2/5 (18 reviews) 4. [Tricentis Test Management for Jira](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/1046103/tricentis-test-management-for-jira) (0 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "If you are executing manual test cases on a large scale then Test Rail is for you" — 4.0/5 > **Neil** | *2018년 12월 20일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: I think report generation is the strong suit of Test rail, the percentage pie chart of passed, failed blocked cases at a glance make daily reporting for scrum stand up meetings ideal. Integration with Jira is excellent, although some room for improvement. > > **단점**: Trying to do something simple like import test case steps from a .csv is not so easy. You can import a suite but that is not ideal. Trying to duplicate cases can be tedious, let's say you have a lot of cases, trying to copy paste them in to various projects is a lot of hassle, it is surprising they have not addressed issues like this after so many years. > > Having using various test management suites TestRail does excel in that it was built to run manual test cases and display results in an easy glance for the whole team. Linking to defects is simple, generating a report when the test run is complete. I feel like reusing regression suites could be improved, it does what it is meant to however you have to repeat several steps each time you want to generate a regression suite. Some areas for improvement would be a test case type for API tests, I am sure everyone needs this but struggles to find a way to record this data. ----- ### "TestRail usage review" — 4.0/5 > **Pavitra** | *2025년 10월 13일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: TestRail is a perfect solution for testcase management. Our team uses the features of milestone creation, test runs and execution analytics of the tool. My favorite feature of TestRail is the ability to add custom fields that can be specific to your project needs. > > **단점**: 1. I would like to use TestRail to expand the capabilities to add confluence documentations as well along with the Jira Tasks 2. Another thing I am not a fan of is the attachments maintenance. It is very hard to navigate to the attached documents or files from a testcase 3. Customer service is not great, we opened couple of issues over the period of time but the responses and updates were too slow or none. In short website performance is good but when you hit bugs there is a gap > > It is good, our company is using TestRail for over 5 years now. We like the easy of use of the tool. We use it for testcase management, test run creation and execution for functional and regression tests. Value for money is good. ----- ### "TestRail in 4 years" — 5.0/5 > **Rakhi** | *2026년 3월 30일* | 정보 기술 및 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: it brings structure and consistency to testing by keeping test cases organized in a clear hierarchy, which makes it easy to maintain coverage over time. I also really value the way it supports repeatable execution through test runs and results tracking—so regression cycles feel more controlled, progress is visible at a glance, and there’s a reliable history of what was tested and what needs re-testing after the dev fixes. > > **단점**: maintaining a large test library can feel a bit manual—bulk updates, reorganizing sections, or refactoring lots of cases takes time and can be tedious. The UI can also feel a little clunky in places (especially around editing steps and keeping formatting consistent), and reporting is sometimes not as flexible as you’d want without extra effort to slice results the way a team needs for release readiness. > > It’s a dependable tool for keeping test cases structured and making regression cycles repeatable, and it gives good visibility into what’s been executed and what still needs attention. Even though some parts could be smoother—especially around bulk maintenance and reporting—it’s still effective for organizing QA work and keeping a clear history of testing over time. ----- ### "Mid-level testing tool" — 1.0/5 > **isaac** | *2025년 10월 23일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 0.0/10 > > **장점**: I liked that it's been around for a long time so it has a lot of legacy features that have been around for a long time. > > **단점**: The fact that it is a legacy tool, it feels old and complex to use. It's also very expensive. And customer service has paywalls. > > Generally mid, not impressed by it but it is a tool that has been around for a long time so it has a lot of general features. ----- ### "Quality Assured" — 5.0/5 > **Gerrit** | *2024년 12월 2일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: It helps our QA team with managing regression testing between multiple remote QA engineers. Adding new test cases is easy, and being able to go back and see who tested each case is extremely valuable. > > **단점**: Getting all of our test cases moved over to TestRail was a huge undertaking, but once done, maintaining has been easy. > > TestRail was a huge step up from our previous process which was a Google Sheet. ----- Page: 1 / 8\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/128204/testrail?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/128204/testrail) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data