--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 Oracle Aconex 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Oracle Aconex 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [건설 관리 소프트웨어](/directory/30057/construction-management/software) > [Oracle Aconex](/software/118711/oracle-aconex) # Oracle Aconex Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/118711/oracle-aconex Page: 1 / 10\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/118711/oracle-aconex?page=2) > 여러 팀을 연결하여 세계를 구축할 수 있게 해주는 디지털 프로젝트 제공 및 관리를 위한 최고의 플랫폼입니다. 전 세계 500만 이상 사용자가 신뢰하는 제품입니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.4/5** by 216 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### Oracle Aconex은(는) 누가 사용하나요? Aconex는 건설, 인프라, 에너지 및 리소스 부문에 서비스를 제공하고, 소유자, 계약업체, EPC, 프로젝트 관리자 및 컨설턴트가 여러 프로젝트 간에 쉽고, 안전하고, 효율적인 방식으로 협업할 수 있게 도와줍니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.4/5** | 216 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 80% | (8/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Oracle - **Location**: Chicago, 미국 - **Founded**: 1977 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$1.00 - **Target Audience**: 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Android(모바일), iPhone(모바일), iPad(모바일) - **Supported Languages**: 독일어, 스페인어, 영어, 이탈리아어, 일본어, 중국어, 폴란드어, 프랑스어, 한국어 - **Available Countries**: 독일, 멕시코, 미국, 브라질, 영국, 오스트레일리아, 인도, 일본, 중국, 캐나다 ## 특징 - Budget Tracking - Subcontractor Monitoring - 감사 내역 - 계약/라이선스 관리 - 계약자 데이터베이스 - 규정 준수 관리 - 대시보드 - 리소스 관리 - 모바일 액세스 - 문서 관리 - 문제 관리 - 보고/분석 - 보고/프로젝트 추적 - 비용 예측 - 사고 보고 - 선별 자격 추적 - 예산/예측 - 위험 관리 - 인벤토리 관리 - 일정 관리 - 입찰 관리 - 작업 관리 - 타임시트 관리 - 태스크 관리 - 파일 공유 - 포트폴리오 관리 - 프로젝트 계획/일정 관리 - 프로젝트 관리 - 프로젝트 추적 - 하도급자 관리 - 협업 도구 ## Integrations (4 total) - Box - Dropbox Business - Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft SharePoint ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 24/7(실시간 담당자) - 채팅 ## Category - [건설 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30057/construction-management/software) ## 관련 범주 - [건설 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30057/construction-management/software) - [계약자 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30853/contractor-management/software) - [프로젝트 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [문서 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31197/document-control/software) - [협업 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## 대안 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15345 reviews) 2. [Clockify](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/169607/clockify) — 4.8/5 (9239 reviews) 3. [Asana](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13557 reviews) 4. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (5944 reviews) 5. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4576 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Very Good, but could be better" — 4.0/5 > **Alan Ernesto** | *2018년 1월 9일* | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **장점**: Fast access. Very easy way to look for the documents. Easy to upload new documents. Secure and safe information. 24 hours a day working. > > **단점**: Improve the module of reviewing documents, it must be without Java, because Java is too slow and have many troubles, maybe you can do the same as you did in the multi upload module. The team that supports our projects must be people who really worked on real projects all over the world, maybe you need to include some Document Controllers that used Aconex for a long time, and includes they in your company. Most of the people in the support team actually didn't know how a real project work using Aconex. > > Fast and very intuitive user experience (if the fields are designed properly by the docuement control team in your enterprise) ----- ### "Easy to use and great functionality." — 5.0/5 > **Susan** | *2018년 1월 25일* | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **장점**: Provides a global platform that allows many user to work together. Easy to add new files to the system. All mail is kept in the Mail module and it can't be erased, so you can't lose any correspondence. Easy to create workflow templates. Easy to run reports on workflows and RFI's. No size limit on the files. It functions like it was advertised and more. > > **단점**: Have to use the mail form titles that Aconex has pre-loaded into the system. Sometimes can get confused when working in the backend of the system where you might need to make a change. > > Aconex helps us work on a global scale with many clients ----- ### "JV - Aconex Review" — 3.0/5 > **Joe** | *2023년 10월 10일* | 건설 | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **장점**: Record keeping of all historical project communications. > > **단점**: Platform is dated. Mobile access is bad. Web platform is not responsive and up to modern standards > > It is the main player in Oceania. Procore is not much better anyways. ----- ### "Provided easy access to design documentation for review and keeping track of record." — 5.0/5 > **Kam** | *2018년 1월 9일* | 운송/트럭/철도 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: Be able to retrieve documentation easily and support from Aconex is great. It also offered process flow in project delivery which is clear to project teams. The email like within the software is easy to understand for all users and if that person knows how to send an email he or she knows Aconex. > > **단점**: Cannot think of any. However, the cost of the software might be a little pricey. One improvement that I would like to see with the software is a better tagging routine that is able to tagged files and become searchable. Currently searches are still very rudimentary. The BIM viewver tab should also could be improved adding more features to it or better still have a full feature BIM viewer and could reconize RVT as well as Bently 3D files without having to convert to IFCs. > > Benefits are many as described earlier. Be able to have a process flow of all projects saving time, reducing cost, be able to identify issues and commenting of design documentation. ----- ### "Successfully configured and implemented Aconex on several large programs." — 4.0/5 > **Hans** | *2018년 1월 15일* | 토목 공학 > > **장점**: It is the solid single-point-of-truth for large, complex programs. It integrates information flow (correspondence), documents, packaged deliverables, cost, field inspections and BIM together very well. It span from bid/tender phase all the way through design, construction, test/commissioning and close-out. If implemented properly with industry best practice processes, it can significantly reduce risk on large, complex programs, especially those with multiple contract and technical interfaces. > > **단점**: Some of the administration features are somewhat cumbersome on implementations with a large number of users, especially at the organizational administration level. As with any software implementation, training and institutionalization is one of the hardest and most important aspects to be successful. There are a few features (like RFI closeout) that make it a little more difficult to institutionalize such that report data remains in tact. ----- Page: 1 / 10\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/118711/oracle-aconex?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/118711/oracle-aconex) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data