--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 FlexSim 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: FlexSim 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [시뮬레이션 소프트웨어](/directory/30607/simulation/software) > [FlexSim](/software/107009/flexsim) # FlexSim Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/107009/flexsim Page: 1 / 6\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/107009/flexsim?page=2) > FlexSim은 모든 프로세스를 모델링, 분석, 시각화 및 최적화하도록 도와줍니다. 기존 데이터를 정확한 예측값으로 전환하세요\! > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 128 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### FlexSim은(는) 누가 사용하나요? FlexSim은 제조, 창고 관리, 공급망, 물류 및 의료 분야의 엔지니어와 의사 결정자가 더 쉽고 강력하게 시뮬레이션 모델링과 분석을 수행하도록 설계되었습니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.6/5** | 128 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Autodesk - **Location**: San Rafael, 미국 - **Founded**: 1982 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Windows(데스크톱), Windows(온프레미스) - **Supported Languages**: 영어, 일본어, 중국어, 중국어 - **Available Countries**: 그리스, 나이지리아, 남아프리카, 네덜란드, 노르웨이, 뉴질랜드, 대만, 대한민국, 덴마크, 독일, 러시아, 루마니아, 말레이시아, 멕시코, 모로코, 미국, 벨기에, 브라질, 스웨덴, 스위스 and 30 more ## 특징 - 3D 이미징 - 그래픽 데이터 표현 - 동적 모델링 - 모션 모델링 - 보고/분석 - 수학적 모델링 - 에이전트 기반 모델링 - 이산 이벤트 모델링 - 지속적 모델링 - 직접 조작 - 프레젠테이션 도구 - 확률적 모델링 ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 채팅 ## Category - [시뮬레이션 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30607/simulation/software) ## 대안 1. [AnyLogic](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/95940/anylogic) — 4.5/5 (518 reviews) 2. [MATLAB](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/125813/matlab) — 4.6/5 (2093 reviews) 3. [Visual Components](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/188853/visual-components) — 4.4/5 (53 reviews) 4. [COMSOL Multiphysics](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/123801/comsol-multiphysics) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 5. [Arena](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/144460/arena) — 4.1/5 (28 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Great looking and advanced simulations" — 5.0/5 > **Igor** | *2019년 6월 20일* | 교육 관리 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Great visualization makes it very pleasant to start learning; Lots of built-in features, Data import-export; Different modes (3D, ProcessFlow), where you can work simultaneously or independently; Strong statistics (distributions), that can be integrated on the models, collecting and presenting data; Anything you lack regarding the model or actor logic can be added as code snippets; Really basic models can be made in minutes > > **단점**: It becomes difficult to learn it when you go in deep. The really basic actions are easy and intuitive, like for kids. But when you get to something just little more complex - it requires a lot of additional knowledge. Little community tutorials. There are not many community samples and tutorials on youtube or in the web. Most of them are over basic functions - you probably will need to enroll a training. > > I am a teacher in university. I had never worked with simulation software before, so it was my first software of such type. FlexSim is just a whole universe, with it's own logic and rules. If you want to do BIG things with it - you have to understand all of these rules, accept them and change your own thinking to follow that rules (to think like FlexSim would think). I am a very advanced user of Excel, and Excel is a large universe as well. But now I am wondering which of them is bigger. ----- ### "FlexSim is a Great Tool" — 4.0/5 > **Kavan** | *2019년 6월 14일* | 식품 생산 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: What I like most about FlexSim is the software's ease of use. I did trials on several other simulation software and FlexSim came out on top for me. It was intuitive and just simply made sense when building models. After the initial training I built a simulation model to represent one of our biggest production plants. Having that 3D visual was key in explaining processes to the rest of the team, and I could make real time changes in the model to work through those "what if" scenarios. The intricate details and the ability to allow viewers to see a different perspectives is actually very eye opening. > > **단점**: What I like least about the software is the lack of floor levels that are representative of actual buildings. This might be minor, but I wished there were options for prebuilt stairs and different floor levels. Stairs and floor levels are common in plants, hospitals, airport, etc., so why not give the user those items in the toolbox. For example, if I wanted to simulate a building with three floors, with people walking from one floor to the other (not necessarily one above the other, otherwise we wouldn't be able to see the operation on the other floors), using a second and third elevated floor plan. Hopefully that makes sense. > > At the moment I use FlexSim to simulation the possibilities within a given confined space. I build models to represent a few different scenarios and demonstrate them to the team, so that leadership can make a decision on particular go/no-go criteria for a project. I use FlexSim to demonstrate possibilities that people in the viewing group might not have even considered, and generate new conversations regarding what's possible and which direction to go. ----- ### "Very pretty, but too hard to use if not in it often" — 3.0/5 > **Kate** | *2025년 12월 15일* | 병원 및 의료 | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **장점**: It was a very pretty way to show simulations that have real potential to be useful to show off to champions and project sponsors. > > **단점**: I tried very hard and have a lot of background in simulation and couldn't get to a point where it made sense for our company to use it, I wasn't confident in the mathematical rigor of the simulations, and couldn't train my coworkers to use it, > > I really wanted to try like it but ended up not choosing it for the simulation software my company uses. ----- ### "Long time Simulation practitioner" — 5.0/5 > **Dhuey** | *2019년 6월 20일* | 식품 및 음료 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: Very easy to build a simple model with the 3D Objects. The 3D objects have enough hooks in place to deal with more complex situations as well. There is no need to know programing language. The software is a tool that can be used by both the novice and experienced modeler. > > **단점**: The users manual is a bit hard to follow, and missing some information. I would like more options for flow item shapes and shapes for resources. > > We are using FlexSim to evaluate a new production line, everything from equipment capability, line control logic and staffing. The data from the simulations has enabled us to reduce staffing, and equipment requirements. ----- ### "All purpose simulation software" — 5.0/5 > **Vincent** | *2019년 6월 13일* | 경영 컨설팅 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Stunning interactive 3D graphics, full programming capabilities (no external compiler needed), links with Excel and SQL databases, ability to customize anything and develop reusable libraries > > **단점**: Limited cloud interactivity, too many new important features appearing, company focus seems to be on Process Flow module which is more complicated to use by programmers and less object-oriented > > I simulate mining sites (surface and underground), mine-to-port logistics, food and beverage plants, airport baggage handling systems, mechanical workshops, manufacturing assembly lines, distribution centers, distribution networks, supply chains, rail and road transport systems. Very visual although visual can be turned off or ignored, very efficient flexscript language, I can simulate a wide range of industries with a single tool. ----- Page: 1 / 6\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/107009/flexsim?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/107009/flexsim) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data