--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 AppO 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: AppO 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [의사 결정 지원 소프트웨어](/directory/30544/decision-support/software) > [AppO](/software/1023451/appo) # AppO Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/1023451/appo > 여러 전략과 이해관계자의 의견을 고려해야 하는 어렵거나 복잡한 의사 결정 프로세스를 단순화합니다. > > Verdict: Rated **5.0/5** by 3 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### AppO은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 유형 및 무형의 조건을 다 고려하고 동시에 다양한 이해관계자의 관점, 전략 및 전문가 의견을 분석하여 의사 결정을 내려야 하는 모든 업계의 관리자를 대상으로 합니다. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **5.0/5** | 3 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 5.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 5.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 5.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: Kepa Software ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: AU$59.99 - **Pricing model**: (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반 - **Supported Languages**: 영어 - **Available Countries**: 가나, 가봉, 가이아나, 감비아, 건지, 과들루프, 과테말라, 괌, 그레나다, 그리스, 그린란드, 기니, 기니비사우, 나미비아, 나우루, 나이지리아, 남아프리카, 네덜란드, 네팔, 노르웨이 and 208 more ## 특징 - KPI 모니터링 - 데이터 분석 도구 - 데이터 시각화 - 보고/분석 - 성능 메트릭 ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - 지식 기반 - 전화 지원 - 24/7(실시간 담당자) ## Category - [의사 결정 지원 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30544/decision-support/software) ## 관련 범주 - [의사 결정 지원 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30544/decision-support/software) - [지속 가능성 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31216/sustainability/software) ## 대안 1. [airfocus](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/172674/airfocus) — 4.5/5 (124 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "Working wonders in resources" — 5.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2022년 3월 3일* | 인적 자원 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: Being able to model our full cost/benefit analysis alongside our ESG considerations. Also being able to model our entire corporate structure. > > **단점**: Visualisation could be mare graphically based but we were able to work with it. > > Working in the resources industry we are often challenged by the complexity of capital investment decisions. Thankfully we found AppO so now our decisions are made simply, regardless of complexity and in a much shorter timeframe that without AppO. We couldn’t recommend AppO more highly. ----- ### "Investing in Multiple Markets" — 5.0/5 > **Gregory** | *2022년 3월 1일* | 환경 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **장점**: Comparing investments made in differing markets and under differing business models. > > **단점**: Currency conversion does not occur on the fly. > > Many companies, like us, operate in multiple markets and multiple countries, which makes it difficult from a corporate perspective to compare investment opportunities across those markets. Finding AppO eliminated the issue entirely, presenting us with detailed comparisons of relative business value for each of the potential investments even though the differing markets required differing approaches to measuring value. ----- ### "Establishing Production Capacity" — 5.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2022년 2월 24일* | 기계 또는 산업 공학 | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **장점**: The ability to develop multiple strategies and plans and understand the relative value of each plan to the business. You talk about having a plan B, we have plans C and D as well, each potentially triggered at by pre-specified project status conditions. > > **단점**: Pairwise comparison can be onerous for an executive. We set the upper level priorities at an executive level and our production managers and construction advisers to populate the rest. > > We needed to make a critical decision about creating further production capacity. Were we going to outsource, build from scratch, acquire pre-built and fit-out? When we laid out the basis of the decision we found we had over 100 selection criteria many of which were intangible. AppO made light work of the problem and we were even able to identify a series of fall-back strategies on project options. ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/1023451/appo) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data