--- description: 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 Assembla 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요! 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Assembla 가격, 사용 후기, 평점 | 켑테라 Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [홈](/) > [소스 코드 관리 소프트웨어](/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) > [Assembla](/software/112631/assembla) # Assembla Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/112631/assembla Page: 1 / 5\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/112631/assembla?page=2) > Subversion, Perforce 및 Git 저장소를 위한 클라우드 호스팅을 제공하는 보안 버전 제어 및 프로젝트 협업 플랫폼입니다. > > Verdict: Rated **4.2/5** by 103 users. Top-rated for **추천 가능성**. ----- ## Overview ### Assembla은(는) 누가 사용하나요? 팀 구축 소프트웨어. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **종합** | **4.2/5** | 103 리뷰 | | 사용 편의성 | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 고객 지원 | 3.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 비용 대비 가치 | 3.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | 특징 | 4.0/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 70% | (7/10 추천 가능성) | ## 공급업체 정보 - **회사**: IDERA - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **시작 가격**: US$19.00 - **Pricing model**: (무료 체험판) - **Target Audience**: 자영업, 2~10, 11~50, 51~200, 201~500, 501~1,000, 1,001~5,000, 5,001~10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: 클라우드, SaaS, 웹 기반, Mac(데스크톱), Windows(데스크톱), Linux(데스크톱) - **Supported Languages**: 영어 - **Available Countries**: 가나, 가봉, 가이아나, 감비아, 건지, 과들루프, 과테말라, 괌, 그레나다, 그리스, 그린란드, 기니, 기니비사우, 나미비아, 나우루, 나이지리아, 남아프리카, 네덜란드, 네팔, 노르웨이 and 208 more ## 특징 - API - Sub-Task Management - Task Editing - 간트/타임라인 보기 - 과제 관리 - 규정 준수 관리 - 그래픽 사용자 인터페이스 - 리소스 관리 - 마감 관리 - 마일스톤 추적 - 문서 관리 - 문제 관리 - 버전 제어 - 보고/프로젝트 추적 - 시간 및 비용 추적 - 시간 추적 - 우선순위 부여 - 워크플로 관리 - 주석/참고 - 청구 및 송장 발행 - 코드 검토 - 태스크 관리 - 통합 개발 환경 - 파일 공유 - 포트폴리오 관리 - 프로젝트 계획/일정 관리 - 프로젝트 관리 - 협업 도구 ## Integrations (14 total) - Dropbox Business - Filestack - GitHub - Gmail - Google Docs - Google Drive - Jira - Meta for Business - OneDrive - Slack - TestRail - Travis CI - Trello - Zapier ## Support Options - 이메일/지원 센터 - FAQ/포럼 - 지식 기반 - 24/7(실시간 담당자) - 채팅 ## Category - [소스 코드 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) ## 관련 범주 - [소스 코드 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) - [애플리케이션 개발 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [태스크 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [제품 수명 주기 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30009/product-lifecycle-management/software) - [프로젝트 관리 소프트웨어](https://www.capterra.co.kr/directory/30002/project-management/software) ## 대안 1. [Jira](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15314 reviews) 2. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6155 reviews) 3. [Juno.one](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/204436/junoone) — 4.4/5 (26 reviews) 4. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (5726 reviews) 5. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4561 reviews) ## 리뷰 ### "A one Hub solution that could work a bit faster" — 4.0/5 > **Corstiaan** | *2021년 2월 4일* | 인터넷 | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **장점**: It's a one-hub solution. Everything I need is within reach. Task management and planning in the card-wall of tickets are indispensable. > > **단점**: Slow: Opening a page or a ticket can sometimes take seconds of looking at a blank page. When used in meeting this is really annoying. Clutter: It lacks options to clean-up. Since I work with it for 10 years I have 150 projects in my view and no way to hide old projects. New projects appear at the bottom of that list, so scrolling galore\! Yes, I could go to the project-owner and ask him to archive, but you know how that goes in large companies and I don't have rights to archive so I'm stuck with over 10 years of old projects. GIT: It could use some more optimizations, specially Merge-request handling / canceling, retaining comments etc. > > It's a solution that has it all but I would welcome an overhaul of UI and backend optimization for speed. It feels like there's a lot of ancient code in there. ----- ### "Strive to be best toolset for development organization" — 4.0/5 > **검증된 리뷰어** | *2020년 2월 11일* | 정보 기술 및 서비스 | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **장점**: It is a cloud based solution and can be accessed from anywhere. Support for protocols like git. It has embedded document management workflow. > > **단점**: Lack of support for document search. Lack of support for wide adoption among developers. No easy way of project management, bug tracking etc. At the least the versions that we used in the past. No management reports. It serves the basic purpose of source code management with git. No clear support for command line tools and scripting for ci/cd pipelines. > > It is ok for smaller teams. It is affordable. Not much of online documentation, but most parts are intuitive. ----- ### "Zero Customer Service" — 2.0/5 > **Christopher** | *2024년 10월 7일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 0.0/10 > > **장점**: It was not hard to use but I would not say it was easy or intuitive either. > > **단점**: By far, the customer service is the worst I have ever been involved with, especially at the management level. At several points during the conversation with a manager named \[sensitive content hidden\], he even laughed at the situation and specifically at me. The entire staff is in Portugal and from top to bottom I have never been treated so poorly by a company. > > Overall, after not following their 30-day cancellation policy to the letter we were automatically billed for an extra year with zero refund. Not only did nobody there apologize, I was even informed that they are very proud of their commitment to sticking to the policy. I even listened to \[sensitive content hidden\] tell me about a prior customer who made it all the way to the sensitive content hidden\] of the company, but in the end they were also not given one cent back. ----- ### "Assembla for SVN only" — 5.0/5 > **scott** | *2021년 5월 6일* | 컴퓨터 소프트웨어 | Recommendation rating: 4.0/10 > > **장점**: Reliable SVN Server, pretty fast, easy to manage > > **단점**: We just use the SVN features, it's ridiculously expensive per person for SVN,. > > Other than the ridiculous cost its been extremely reliable for the past 7 years we have used it. We've had a couple short outages but they were very brief and got quick attention from their support. ----- ### "honest opinion" — 4.0/5 > **Steffano** | *2021년 2월 13일* | 엔터테인먼트 | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **장점**: It seems very secure, and I love the fact that you can see which files others have checked out, that's huge thing when working with a big team. > > **단점**: It's super slow when you need to revert files or when you added 2k files to a submit queue and you decide not to move forward with the submit. That will take a lot of time and it's really annoying. One last thing is that is a pain in the ass for new users especially for artists to setup perforce, perforce should have automated tools to setup your workspace, like a wizard to ask you about the basics. Having to open the command to type manual commands is not intuitive. > > Even with its flaws it's a good option over git and svn, it has a nice webapp to help you keep track of the project and source files. ----- Page: 1 / 5\ 다음: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/112631/assembla?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.kr/software/112631/assembla) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data